Bad performance? What?

[waterdaca]

I have Ryzen 5 2600, 16 GB Ram, 1660 Ti and with Ultra graphics settings I have average 50 fps. Highest 80, lowest 30, in a single player game.

What is the problem? Sorry for the question, but I don't understand the main raging.

[MAXTAC]

It has poor frame pacing and noticeable stutter. It is unacceptable. People are upset because it is compromising enjoyment for them.

[Tru9mm]

i7-3770k @4ghz, 32gb RAM, GTX 1660 super 6gbVRAM, 1080p @60fps on medium settings no raytracing smooth as butter performance beautiful game.

[MAXTAC]

Originally posted by tru9mm:

i7-3770k @4ghz, 32gb RAM, GTX 1660 super 6gbVRAM, 1080p @60fps on medium settings no raytracing smooth as butter performance beautiful game.

I have a 3080 and 10850k, noticeable stutter when it deviates from the imposed cap of 120 fps or 60fps. It is a widespread and common issue, people are justifiably upset. I have refunded and will continue playing it on PS5. It's not as nice there but at least it's more consistent.

[Shepherd]

What you consider good I consider not good. That's all there is to it really.

Even when you have 120 FPS solid it feels bad. Something is just wrong with the game. Playing on a controller has helped me notice it less.

[Jakkauli]

I have 80-120 fps but most of the time it feels like crap, like it's 40 fps or worse.

[MooP]

Frame pacing from the engine is the issue, devs are working on patch... (hope it works)

Digital foundry proved that every 5th frame the game skips making aiming very odd & thus the "stutter" people are feeling. You can have great FPS that isn't fully the issue...

[< Flixce1r >]

even if you have 120fps but the framerate drop for some scene/stutter
trust me it's worse than Stable 30fps

[FeilDOW]

Not a single issue with stutters or anything, running extremely smooth with max settings at 5120x1440. I just have the odd crash here and there that can be annoying.

[Villain]

It's their trash modified engine that they keep using. they should've used idtech6 or UE4

[Zoopy]

Originally posted by Villain:

It's their trash modified engine that they keep using. they should've used idtech6 or UE4

Should have used CryEngine, like Prey 2017. That game ran great.

[Aeolun JP]

I don't think I have a terrible machine, but I can't even run it at 1080p on LOW. Prey is fine, Dishonored 2 is also fine. But this... This I can only run at 720p with adaptive scaling regularly pushing it down to 480p. Kind of makes me feel like I'm playing a retro game instead of a modern AAA title.

[FeilDOW]

Originally posted by Aeolun JP:

I don't think I have a terrible machine, but I can't even run it at 1080p on LOW. Prey is fine, Dishonored 2 is also fine. But this... This I can only run at 720p with adaptive scaling regularly pushing it down to 480p. Kind of makes me feel like I'm playing a retro game instead of a modern AAA title.

Sounds like it's actually more your rigs fault rather then the games.

[MAXTAC]

Originally posted by FeilDOW:

Not a single issue with stutters or anything, running extremely smooth with max settings at 5120x1440. I just have the odd crash here and there that can be annoying.

Sure buddy, sure you are. Sometimes I wish I had defective eyeballs too, life would be simpler.

[FeilDOW]

Originally posted by SuperNecessary:

Originally posted by FeilDOW:

Not a single issue with stutters or anything, running extremely smooth with max settings at 5120x1440. I just have the odd crash here and there that can be annoying.

Sure buddy, sure you are. Sometimes I wish I had defective eyeballs too, life would be simpler.

Just be happy with your defective PC.

You understand it doesn't effect everyone right?

[Power_Bert]

Originally posted by Jakkauli:

I have 80-120 fps but most of the time it feels like crap, like it's 40 fps or worse.

Exactly. I am now at a point where i tuned the settings to my liking.
80 fps feel like 25 fps in deathloop.
Makes the action unsatisfying.