Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
I'm not trying to sell you on MSFS 2020 or 2024 but I think your logic is falsely based on the assumption MSFS 2020 has the same flight modeling as FSX. As for X-Plane vs. the current MSFS, this snippet was recently posted in a similar debate in this forum:
As for DCS, if you think the limited maps are sufficient in size and detail for jet liners, I'll concede that. However, even the premium DCS maps are not of a significantly higher resolution than the base MSFS world. Maybe I should fly over some MSFS regions without streaming any Bing map textures and compare the scenery to their DCS equivalents.
Anyhow, I currently only fly MSFS single engine GA aircraft these days. MSFS 2020 surpasses Prepar3D, even with P3D loaded to the rafters with weather and scenery addons. But as I said before, I can't speak to commercial jets or how they compare across any flight simulation platform.