Bug Simulator 22

[Shazam]

This game has so many bugs and sadly I've past the refund steam limit. I really want to like this game, but I find myself having to restart the game over and over just to unload grass for example. Is anyone else having issues as well? I've been playing since fs17 and never seen it this bad before.

[Thomas]

Wizard の投稿を引用：

Shazam の投稿を引用：

I know i'm going to show my age and that's fine, but if this was early 2000s it would have to be near perfect before a game could be released, there was no hot fixes. The fact that I paid $50 for a game to wait for a hot fix is just bad, and i'm the dumb one for falling for it unfortunately. I miss the golden age of games :/

Oh Lord, another cry thread.

You know, your precious games of the 2000s are still around and can mostly be had pretty cheaply on ebay.

Why don't you go play those and stop crying here?

[martindehez]

bonjour, j'ai un soucis quand je la,ce farming, il me mettent error s 0000065432 et je n'arrive pas a réparer ceci . si vous pouvez m'aidez cela serait gentil :)

[Graubart]

Oh yeeees, and I remember the golden era of people buying magazines and using up days to type listings from these magazines into their BASIC interpreter. That's how games were distributed in the early 80s. Anybody wanna go back to these times? It would probably be very good, for educational purposes. Since it demonstrates how it feels to find the one occasional typo within 2000 lines of code you just had to copy from the magazine using your keyboard. Looking at the amount of typos in the Steam discussions I bet 95 % of all people posting here would not pass the test :-)

[Shazam]

My comment went over a lot of your heads lol

[Star Lord]

Thomas の投稿を引用：

Shazam の投稿を引用：

Not true at all lol

So are you saying if you had game like FS 22 in 1999 or 2000 you will play something else on PS1 instead?
I am not defending bugs in this game. We need patch. But lets get real . 20 years ago games were not that complicated and didn't have so many futures like today.

I'll agree with this.

I grew up in the era of the Commodore 64, when I had its cassette player to load games. You had to put the cassette into the player, fast forward the cassette to the location where the game was, type "Load" on the keyboard, press Return, then Play on the cassette player, wait for the game to load into the RAM, and when it paused, Stop the cassette player. Then type RUN and press Return and then the game loaded.

Oh, and whoa be unto you if you had copy protection because geez, what seemed like every 20 minutes or so, the game would ask you to turn to page so and so in the manual and look for the word on paragraph such and such, word 4 and type it in. And that was annoying enough. And if you lost that manual? Sucks to be you!

Anyway, those games were small enough that they were coded very well and QAd even better.

[BaneMatter]

Plain and simple, if a few bugs can stop you from enjoying this game then just go play "Oregon Trail" on your Windows 3.0 PC ;)

[Joelle]

TheRealNinja_TTV の投稿を引用：

Plain and simple, if a few bugs can stop you from enjoying this game then just go play "Oregon Trail" on your Windows 3.0 PC ;)

Hey now, don't hate on my Oregon Trail game!

[kilésengati]

Look at this picture![web.archive.org]

This is no excuse for developers releasing bug-infested games, yet the consumer landscape was much different back in the day - patience being a key element.
There were internet forums in the 2000s and users took even larger and more vial dumps on bad devs because they had to download all these patches via ISDN or even dial-up connection - and all that after they had returned home from a sometimes day-long journey to the mall or after waiting a week or longer when having it sent by mail. Thus, reasonable devs put the extra effort into quality assurance and both publishers and consumers were okay with a game being delayed for such reasons.

This was neither good nor bad, just the zeitgeist!

It was objectively a much more humane and prosperous time though.

Due to everything being instant access nowadays, consumers don't have the patience anymore and devs/publishers see no reason to miss out on a quick buck if they can fix the game with multiple huge but relatively fast to download updates. There simply is no perfect way of handling QA anymore. The market is more hostile than ever, so why miss-out on business‽ Bad practice, but understandable given the circumstances.
Use this knowledge to your advantage and don't pre-order anything if you can't afford to loose that money on a bad product

Zillenial rant over.

[Etny2k]

Lets just approach the elephant in the room. These devs are washed up.

[Thomas Kirkman]

Flat out, we need a patch update or SOME information about when it will be applied. We're the ones paying their wages and a little consideration goes a long way. 2 weeks and nothing is VERY poor business and a sure way to loose even more customers.

[Star Lord]

Thomas Kirkman の投稿を引用：

Flat out, we need a patch update or SOME information about when it will be applied. We're the ones paying their wages and a little consideration goes a long way. 2 weeks and nothing is VERY poor business and a sure way to loose even more customers.

They had said either on Twitter or Discord that it was coming prior to Christmas.