ELDEN RING

ELDEN RING

Ver estadísticas:
Este tema ha sido cerrado
28 FEB 2023 a las 12:30 a. m.
199
33
15
59
14
11
17
16
15
29
7
13
23
8
11
11
9
9
4
4
3
3
3
269
Rise, Tarnished, and let us walk a new path together.
< >
Mostrando 2,086-2,100 de 2,650 comentarios
Infedelity 7 MAR 2023 a las 6:12 a. m. 
Make sure to do your part by reporting Cheaters!
Dopaminer 7 MAR 2023 a las 7:08 a. m. 
Yes I look forward to new adventures in the Lands Between!
BadAssAtron 7 MAR 2023 a las 8:42 a. m. 
actual ultra wide support?
PoimPoin 7 MAR 2023 a las 8:44 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por SnowJester:
Opinion:

I'm requesting the expansion to match 80% the landmass of the original game and charge a $70 price for sustainability and to support developers. Why should we pay $30 for a limgrave expansion, when you can pay full, and double the size of Eldin Ring...

I feel if the price matches $70, and this expansion doubles Eldin Ring in landmass, and everything, essentially its 2 Eldins in one... and that it's successful (sales)...

Then it can change the future, in what way?

Imagine a world where we look back and all we have is Dark Souls... (which is Dark Souls 1 and 2 and 3 merged into 1 landmass) because the purchasing trends favored paying to expand current engines instead of 'buying new games'..

Imagine (for pokemon players) all the pokemon in 1 game... because we favored purchasing $$$ and paying.. for larger expansions of existing games... opposed to buying 'new games'.

The only time you should make 'a new game' is when the game is 'bloated' due to the nature of it's size, being hard to work with anymore.. when it's 'outdated' which is less a thing these days.. when it no longer gets attention.. which this is on us.. so I say if we are surprised with double Eldin Ring landmass at $70, buy it. It shows other developers what to focus on. Making quality expansive games.

Elden Ring doesn't worse 70$ at all, 75% of the content is taken from the Past From Software Games and have the same problems and bugs. The game should cost 30$ for the development, the content is soft and there is nothing that great in this game. 320hours in this game, and I already bored at 20 because of the lack of content.

And no, I haven't played the game as a tourist, no guide and full exploration in 80 hours (in case that idea may cross your mind or anyone else who read this).
Smokey 7 MAR 2023 a las 9:44 a. m. 
ultra wide and over 60fps would be nice to see added
XGear 7 MAR 2023 a las 11:13 a. m. 
Are this a Big content or just some new improvements? I mean, more maps to explore, weapons, magics etc?
averyhungryhobo 7 MAR 2023 a las 11:40 a. m. 
still havent beaten solder of godrick
LLORD SEnPaI 7 MAR 2023 a las 12:06 p. m. 
ADD ARABIC Subtitle PLS
battle_net_danny 7 MAR 2023 a las 12:28 p. m. 
ENDLICH !!!!!!
Cjcivicx 7 MAR 2023 a las 12:39 p. m. 
Publicado originalmente por FR Yuzu:
Ultrawide dlc ?
No.
Raikalex 7 MAR 2023 a las 1:02 p. m. 
The situation is Miquellica
Gublin 7 MAR 2023 a las 1:39 p. m. 
Publicado originalmente por PigeonGris07:
Publicado originalmente por SnowJester:
Opinion:

I'm requesting the expansion to match 80% the landmass of the original game and charge a $70 price for sustainability and to support developers. Why should we pay $30 for a limgrave expansion, when you can pay full, and double the size of Eldin Ring...

I feel if the price matches $70, and this expansion doubles Eldin Ring in landmass, and everything, essentially its 2 Eldins in one... and that it's successful (sales)...

Then it can change the future, in what way?

Imagine a world where we look back and all we have is Dark Souls... (which is Dark Souls 1 and 2 and 3 merged into 1 landmass) because the purchasing trends favored paying to expand current engines instead of 'buying new games'..

Imagine (for pokemon players) all the pokemon in 1 game... because we favored purchasing $$$ and paying.. for larger expansions of existing games... opposed to buying 'new games'.

The only time you should make 'a new game' is when the game is 'bloated' due to the nature of it's size, being hard to work with anymore.. when it's 'outdated' which is less a thing these days.. when it no longer gets attention.. which this is on us.. so I say if we are surprised with double Eldin Ring landmass at $70, buy it. It shows other developers what to focus on. Making quality expansive games.

Elden Ring doesn't worse 70$ at all, 75% of the content is taken from the Past From Software Games and have the same problems and bugs. The game should cost 30$ for the development, the content is soft and there is nothing that great in this game. 320hours in this game, and I already bored at 20 because of the lack of content.

And no, I haven't played the game as a tourist, no guide and full exploration in 80 hours (in case that idea may cross your mind or anyone else who read this).
terrible troll lmao
Warsign 7 MAR 2023 a las 2:36 p. m. 
Hell yes! This game was so immersive, allowing one to leave their physical world for a while.
sendayo 7 MAR 2023 a las 3:25 p. m. 
:er_wave:
< >
Mostrando 2,086-2,100 de 2,650 comentarios
Por página: 1530 50