ติดตั้ง Steam
เข้าสู่ระบบ
|
ภาษา
简体中文 (จีนตัวย่อ)
繁體中文 (จีนตัวเต็ม)
日本語 (ญี่ปุ่น)
한국어 (เกาหลี)
български (บัลแกเรีย)
Čeština (เช็ก)
Dansk (เดนมาร์ก)
Deutsch (เยอรมัน)
English (อังกฤษ)
Español - España (สเปน)
Español - Latinoamérica (สเปน - ลาตินอเมริกา)
Ελληνικά (กรีก)
Français (ฝรั่งเศส)
Italiano (อิตาลี)
Bahasa Indonesia (อินโดนีเซีย)
Magyar (ฮังการี)
Nederlands (ดัตช์)
Norsk (นอร์เวย์)
Polski (โปแลนด์)
Português (โปรตุเกส - โปรตุเกส)
Português - Brasil (โปรตุเกส - บราซิล)
Română (โรมาเนีย)
Русский (รัสเซีย)
Suomi (ฟินแลนด์)
Svenska (สวีเดน)
Türkçe (ตุรกี)
Tiếng Việt (เวียดนาม)
Українська (ยูเครน)
รายงานปัญหาเกี่ยวกับการแปลภาษา
None of that matters, It's just legal mumbo Jumbo. I could download a big jiggly breast physics mod and Namco would consider that cheating under their legal terms, Even tho nothing about that actually gives me a cheater's advantage.
It's funny tho seeing the lengths the copetrain will stretch in order to slander a mod that made the game better.
It's not...wrong...to say seamless coop is cheating, but in a lot of cases It's like saying "I'm selling a car for tweny bucks!" and then demanding to be paid in male deer when customers approach you - the statement is true on a technical level, but it's manipulative because it's being used in a misleading context to get the reader to draw a reasonable but incorrect conclusion.
The problem is that "cheating" is a hugely loaded term in gaming and is most strongly associated with cheating for an advantage in PvP games. By specifically denigrating the coop mod as a "cheat" people are able to pass negative moral judgements or implications on its users and bypass the part where it's a cheat in the same way a bunch of other mods they conveniently almost never have anything bad to say about like overhauls and shop mods and what have you are.
Did the game rules are * you can choose option to not get invaded if you co-op* ? No. Game rules are * if you co-op you can be invaded * deleting invasion while keeping co-op is cheat that's all. Be in you're dream if you want but it is what it is. Theire is no point to play co-op if you can't get invaded since invasion is the part of fun and tens for that.
Your only options are either create a new character or wait for Seamless Baby Difficulty to uptade for the dlc. You might have to wait several months if a colleseum update os of any indicator, as well as lack of updates for several game versions.
Using 3rd party software (including mods) to remove challenge from the game (in that case invasions) is in fact cheating.
So if I download seamless, and then download the extra difficulty mod that makes the game 5 times harder then the regular game, am I suddenly not cheating anymore? Is that good enough for you?
Your invader tears are pretty crisp, Keep them flowing. Invasions are stupid to begin with and multiplayer is an unbalanced mess. Don't call people cheaters because they don't want to deal with a broken system. Next you're going to call people who cheese cheaters as well.
Well maybe cheating is a harsh word for it but your logic is flawed. With the coop mode you are not playing by the game's rules. One of those rules is that you cannot coop everywhere. Another rule is that you will get invaded in coop play. Breaking or removing the rules is the literal definition of cheating.
like you will get banned for seamless coop items...
rofl
the seamless coop items get injected on startup of the mod and removed on closing the mod
they are not part of the save file !
So if you do load a seamless coop safe on normal ER you dont have these items since then they dont get injected...
Still cheating but with additional coping.
Deliscious projection.
Those multiple people are wrong though. It's just reality that invasions are part of the game, if you remove part of the game then you are not playing by the game's rules.
It's honestly weird that invaders get so upset about the mod to begin with. They have this illusion in their minds that the mod is to blame for the multiplayer being dead. In reality, the mod has nothing to do with that. The people who're cooping with the mod to avoid invasions, probably wouldn't bother cooping at all in the main game. The people playing the mod are specifically people who don't want anything to do with multiplayer. Invaders are just forced to accept the cold reality that this game's pvp is doodoo.
Also it's worth mentioning that the mod is better for playing other mods with your friends as well. Like the randomizer or the 5 times difficulty mod, etc.
What do you mean not true? How is it not true? I said invasions are part of the game. You said "not true". It just doesn't make any sense.
Just because you think its a terrible system that doesn't make it terrible for everyone, if you don't like it that doesn't mean it's bad. It's also irrelevant in the argument if you like the system or not.
I've copyied the following from a Dark Souls 1 discussion, thanks to CB for it:
https://www.reddit.com/r/darksouls3/comments/r78htf/miyazaki_says_invaders_are_not_meant_to_win/
(ignore the 'invaders are not meant to win' part, this is debunked in the thread itself)
There is a quote from Miyazaki that goes like:
"the *invasion* game-play experience should be similar to an offline single player game with a very strong enemy popping up randomly."
Invaders are suppose to be like mini bosses you encounter, removing them is not playing by the rules, ergo why people call it cheating. It's like skipping a difficult boss encounter when you are meant to beat it. That's literally cheating.