Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Stop telling people how to play the game.
if you allow cerulean tears to be used but not crimson tears, you are rigging the game in favor of casters, in which case; have fun with your "fight club".
either both are allowed or none of them are, otherwise you are deliberately putting one player at major disadvantage.
also the word you are looking for in relation to "sore winners" is "gloating"... a part of gaming that is what makes it fun. if your loss is not followed by a small amount of humiliation, you're less likely to learn what you did wrong.
in fact, i would argue that if you bow honorably before an opponent you defeated despite him pulling off a very bad move, you are just indulging him in his lack of skill, essentially telling him he fought well, when you know damn well that wasn't the case.
invaders are not a problem in fight clubs because you can't have more than 1 enemy player in a game at a time unless you use taunters tongue, in which case you have directly invited invasions upon yourself. its not a duelists' tool.
No attacking your opponent until your opponent consents somehow.
By bowing, block spam or aggressive movement.
No consumables that heal HP.
No leaving the area in which you are dueling in.
Also, we arent telling people how to have fun.
We're telling people how to have proper ettique for dueling, if one wants to participate in duels.
every soulslike game before elden ring no longer matters solely due to the massive influx of new players into the franchise..
Elden Ring has broken all records set by previous titles combined, and to expect millions of people to follow arbitrary rules you've set in place based on archaic notions of "back in my day"-rules is just ridiculous.
are you going to defend the cycle-through system as well based on the fact that this has been the system used in all previous titles? its a garbage system. it should be changed (especially for those who play the game on PC) and it should be welcomed by literally everyone who wants to make the game less bad.
same goes for the flippant camera in this game. should be changed and nobody should argue against, especially if said argument is based on nothing but "back in my day".
And for dueling, there hasn't been a big enough change to warrant any new changes to the honor system.
Would love to try a duel, but I heard that most hosts kick out anyone using Bloodhound step?
2. Git gud
ah so there in fact more unspoken rules than the ones you mentioned, and even more arbitrary depending on what host you run into.
nice.
kinda reminds me of "honorable duel servers" in Mordhau where server hosts would just outright ban certain weapons/shields in order to rig the game in their own favor.
i particularly remember being kicked for using a kite shield because the host got frustrated that he couldn't just sledgehammer me to death.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhckuhUxcgA