seamless coop mod

[{Uppies} Zaneybeast]

heard about this the other day anyone know how close it is to being finished?

[Dragonirian]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย An Irate Walrus:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Dragonirian:

*whispers*
It's free real estate against tos and will be taken down legally.
You will not escape invasions.

*whispers*

You fabricated your evidence last go-round on this. Are you aroused by public embarrassment or something?

Ask the support if using any means of avoiding invasions that are not intended by the developers is against TOS yourself and see what they say.

[An Irate Walrus]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย fauxpas:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Dragonirian:

*whispers*
It's free real estate against tos and will be taken down legally.
You will not escape invasions.

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Dragonirian:

I'd love some mods too. But not the ones that provide a way for casuals to escape invasions.

You are on record as using mods in Souls games that also violate the ToS so you have no credibility.

Expecting intellectual consistency from dragonirian: even Sisyphus stands in awe.

[An Irate Walrus]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Dragonirian:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย An Irate Walrus:

*whispers*

You fabricated your evidence last go-round on this. Are you aroused by public embarrassment or something?

Ask the support if using any means of avoiding invasions that are not intended by the developers is against TOS yourself and see what they say.

We call this shifting the goalposts. You got caught out faking your evidence in your last thread on this subject; burden of proof is always on the claimant, broham, and you flubbed that one *hard.*

[Dragonirian]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย fauxpas:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Dragonirian:

*whispers*
It's free real estate against tos and will be taken down legally.
You will not escape invasions.

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Dragonirian:

I'd love some mods too. But not the ones that provide a way for casuals to escape invasions.

You are on record as using mods in Souls games that also violate the ToS so you have no credibility.

I never avoided invasions. I never avoided *being* invaded. And that's what matters.
It's funny to see how you try to equate graphical mods that show you if you're playing with a cheater with an actual cheat mod that bypasses invasions.

[fauxpas]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย An Irate Walrus:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย fauxpas:

You are on record as using mods in Souls games that also violate the ToS so you have no credibility.

Expecting intellectual consistency from dragonirian: even Sisyphus stands in awe.

There's a reason I'm known as the "♥♥♥♥♥ Empress of the icy veil between worlds". 😇

[fauxpas]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Dragonirian:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย fauxpas:

You are on record as using mods in Souls games that also violate the ToS so you have no credibility.

I never avoided invasions. I never avoided *being* invaded. And that's what matters.
It's funny to see how you try to equate graphical mods that show you if you're playing with a cheater with an actual cheat mod that bypasses invasions.

Nice try, but you are on record as using mods that were not graphical in nature, try having at least a tiny bit of honesty.

[Kain]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย An Irate Walrus:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Dragonirian:

Ask the support if using any means of avoiding invasions that are not intended by the developers is against TOS yourself and see what they say.

We call this shifting the goalposts. You got caught out faking your evidence in your last thread on this subject; burden of proof is always on the claimant, broham, and you flubbed that one *hard.*

Actually, he's been consistently bringing the TOS like we care since forever. I still don't understand why he believes anyone cares.

[Dragonirian]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย An Irate Walrus:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย fauxpas:

You are on record as using mods in Souls games that also violate the ToS so you have no credibility.

Expecting intellectual consistency from dragonirian: even Sisyphus stands in awe.

From: uses tos to enforce invasions, takes aggressive stance against cheats and cheat mods, does nothing against mods that don't provide advantage or bypass invasions.
Those guys: stare into a specific word and use wheasel tactics to push the narrative of "avoiding invasions is actually acceptable"

[McREEEEEE]

I think it's usable but not without hiccups rn.

As for bans? You don't need to worry. Even Valve don't go after private CSGO servers lol. And CSGO is something that make money from online multiplayer, unlike Elden Ring.

Whoever telling you to be wary of bans is just malding lmao

[Smoking Chihuahua]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Dragonirian:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย ItsSoVeryFluffy:

no it is not and im excited for its release.
cant wait for no more invasions

Avoiding invasions is cheating.

Then I guess we are all cheaters
* Tips hat have a good day cheaters club woot

[Dragonirian]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย fauxpas:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Dragonirian:

I never avoided invasions. I never avoided *being* invaded. And that's what matters.
It's funny to see how you try to equate graphical mods that show you if you're playing with a cheater with an actual cheat mod that bypasses invasions.

Nice try, but you are on record as using mods that were not graphical in nature, try having at least a tiny bit of honesty.

Blue sentinel does nothing but show you if somebody is cheating in multiplayer.

[Dragonirian]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย An Irate Walrus:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Dragonirian:

Ask the support if using any means of avoiding invasions that are not intended by the developers is against TOS yourself and see what they say.

We call this shifting the goalposts. You got caught out faking your evidence in your last thread on this subject; burden of proof is always on the claimant, broham, and you flubbed that one *hard.*

We both know that all of this is a dance around invasions. Stop trying to cover it. I called you out directly and you name it "shifting goalposts".

[Dragonirian]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Dragonirian:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย An Irate Walrus:

We call this shifting the goalposts. You got caught out faking your evidence in your last thread on this subject; burden of proof is always on the claimant, broham, and you flubbed that one *hard.*

We both know that all of this is a dance around invasions. Stop trying to cover it. I called you out directly and you name it "shifting goalposts".

Besides, my proof is: try it.
But I know you will just continue to speak empty words.

[ItsSoVeryFluffy]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Dragonirian:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย ItsSoVeryFluffy:

no it is not and im excited for its release.
cant wait for no more invasions

Avoiding invasions is cheating.

um no cheating is adding unlimited runes unlimited health. invasion free coop is not cheating its making the experience better.

[Pyro Penguin]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Dragonirian:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย ItsSoVeryFluffy:

no it is not and im excited for its release.
cant wait for no more invasions

Avoiding invasions is cheating.

playing in offline mode to avoid invasions isnt cheating, and the devs confirmed that we can do whatever we want while playing in offline mode, including modding co-op to function without fromsoft's online service