Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Pretty much yeah.
Please try to first experience 144 fps or even higher and compare it to 60 fps. You will feel the difference and won’t want to go back. You have to experience it to believe it.
It’s 2022. To have the hardware capable of supporting this and a bunch of lazy devs who can’t be asked to write proper code is frustrating.
How can you price such a game at full AAA range and be so lazy?
Be careful, the fan boys will get mad at you. If you say anything about FPS caps or lack of Ultra Wide support they will start breathing really heavily and pounding on their keyboards in a fit of rage.
I honestly have no idea what so ever... The only thing I can think is their machines cant handle higher FPS and they cant afford Ultrawide monitors so they dont want their games to support it out of jealousy? Its the only rational explanation I can think of.
I do have a 144hz monitor and a PC that can play games at that framerate, but for games in this genre I'm satisfied with 60 provided there's not noticeable drops. FPS games is where I tend to really notice it being less smooth at 60 vs 144.