Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But in terms of actual difficulty overall: ds3>er>sekiro
Ds3 you can be invaded solo
Er you can only be invaded in coop and you have stamina to worry about
Sekiro is just spam l1 to block and you can never be invaded
If I had to rank the three I'd say Sekiro > DS3 > ER. ER is by far the easiest game with how many tools you get, it's like comparing OG zombies to BO4/CW zombies. Game gives you tons of tools and safety nets.
Depends on which parts of those games (which bosses/enemies) and when. Sekiro with no-charm/bell in later NGs (in particular doing full 17 boss gauntlet in that context) subjectively fells notably harder I think.
DS1/2/3/ER can (and unfortunately often are) cheesed - giving far too many far too strong non-melee options, not mentioning coop. ER compared to my adventures in underworld depths (extra 30 floors) in nioh2 feels like a relaxing game for kindergarten (from melee perspective, as I only play melee in games like that).
That said, I think this game is easier than DaS3.