Why does v2 loses to v1?

[Kiro]

I heard that all the new machines that been made is a counter to every other machine that been made before. Like v1 being a counter to everything (earthmovers etc.). So my point is, V2 is the latest version of the v series so IT SHOULD COUNTER V1? But we still manage to beat v2 i dont understand how we do it but still we do it?

[user]

hes not, v2 was made for security

[purevessel]

v2 is just v1 but unable to heal. He was a peacetime bot so using blood to heal was less useful than armor.

[garry]

v2 can't coinpunch

or parry

[Kiro]

Originally posted by PureVessel:

v2 is just v1 but unable to heal. He was a peacetime bot so using blood to heal was less useful than armor.

makes sense thanks

[JIIINGJING]

It was basically a super security guard vs a super soldier.

[Titan]

V2 is described to be a cheap knockoff designed to attempt to recoup some of the massive production costs of producing the V1 model. He's not designed to be a massively powerful killing machine; he's designed to be a cheap mall cop you can scatter around rural Kentucky.

[Fo0]

Because V1 is the protagonist?

[calembredaine]

because v1 actually died to v2 like 10 times. or it didn't, but got good at the game beforehand.

Originally posted by Kiro:

I heard that all the new machines that been made is a counter to every other machine that been made before. Like v1 being a counter to everything (earthmovers etc.). So my point is, V2 is the latest version of the v series so IT SHOULD COUNTER V1?

this applies to the final war, not after. peacetime machines like v2, drones and stuff don't follow this logic.

[user]

Originally posted by calembredaine:

because v1 actually died to v2 like 10 times. or it didn't, but got good at the game beforehand.

source?????

[<#76428a>Sharkbilby]

Originally posted by user:

Originally posted by calembredaine:

because v1 actually died to v2 like 10 times. or it didn't, but got good at the game beforehand.

source?????

They believe in "game logic" V1 more than the actual lore. Ironically, their source of game logic would be debunked by the game's terminal entries, which discuss the lore rather than the game logic. The terminal entries are also where you get the truly correct answer to the thread from.

Originally posted by Titan:

V2 is described to be a cheap knockoff designed to attempt to recoup some of the massive production costs of producing the V1 model. He's not designed to be a massively powerful killing machine; he's designed to be a cheap mall cop you can scatter around rural Kentucky.

[MineFurryLPs]

Just because something is newer does not make it better. The PS2's original model was and still is better than the PS2 Slim model they made later.

[calembredaine]

Originally posted by Sharkbilby:

They believe in "game logic" V1 more than the actual lore

such a woosh, and some poorly backed up assessment about me to boot

[user]

Originally posted by calembredaine:

because v1 actually died to v2 like 10 times. or it didn't, but got good at the game beforehand.

if you dont believe in game logic, can you explain how this would even work anyway??? only two V models were ever made, V1 and V2

[calembredaine]

Originally posted by user:

Originally posted by calembredaine:

because v1 actually died to v2 like 10 times. or it didn't, but got good at the game beforehand.

if you dont believe in game logic, can you explain how this would even work anyway??? only two V models were ever made, V1 and V2

idc all that much about either game logic or lore. it's just amusing to drop the occasional "because that's how the game works" instead of usual lore.