Could the development of this game be any slower?

[VouZ_nel]

I know everyone loves to slobber on Hakita's ♥♥♥♥, but I'm just tired of waiting at this point. This game is 5 years in development, Hakita made literal tons of money and IT'S STILL NOT DONE LMAO. Unless you want to do all the challenges, P-rankings and get to the 100th wave in Cybergrind, there's like 4-5h of content. No matter how many sweaty neckbeards I trigger, there's no way around it: it's pathetic. 5 years for 5h of content is pathetic.
This game has so much potential, so many mechanics, weapon combos, movement tech, so many bosses and minibosses... and barely any campaign to actually play. I know there are P-levels, Cybergrind and whatever, but it's not the same as having an actual 10h campaign with huge, interconnected levels, tons of creative arenas etc. Whenever a level starts becoming interesting, it just ends and Hakita abandons the theme for a new one.
Before you say "lmao skill issue, you could just replay the few levels we have ad naseum to get a better rank" no thank you. Levels are good, yes, not enough to replay them for ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ YEARS just because the dev is lazy.
"Creating a video game takes a lot of time and skill" I agree 100%. I know creating video games is hard as ♥♥♥♥ and takes years. But this is just ridiculous at this point. Turbo Overkill only needed a year and a half from its first demo to officialy release with around 20h of content of the base campaign alone, not including Endless and Secret levels. And it also has been created by just one guy and has twice the amount of tech, weapon combos, enemies etc.
Not saying Ultrakill is bad, but the lack of content is just infuriating at this point.

EDIT: https://i.imgur.com/dD4Mbjj.png
this whole saga is getting better and better

[Cocyx The Gay Skeleton]

Originally posted by Snippy the Lizard:

Originally posted by SHUFFLE𝗥𝗨𝗦𝗛̲̳̳̳:

Not quite. Diapers are very much associated with age-play.

https://i.postimg.cc/266C5Q4r/image.png

Abdl is completely different than being a pedophile but you seem very determined to paint me as such so whatever
Also, those are both my OCs, they're of age.

Originally posted by SHUFFLE𝗥𝗨𝗦𝗛̲̳̳̳:

Just because it doesn't break the sites rules, does not make it normal.

But it *was* normal. Once again I can link the original image to show that it was fine

THOSE ARE YOUR OC'S???? YOU HAVE A BABY OC?

[absurDISM]

Originally posted by SHUFFLE𝗥𝗨𝗦𝗛̲̳̳̳:

Originally posted by Snippy the Lizard:

Abdl is completely different than being a pedophile but you seem very determined to paint me as such so whatever
Also, those are both my OCs, they're of age.

But it *was* normal. Once again I can link the original image to show that it was fine

Normal in what context? Most reasonable people consider ABDL to be pedo-adjacent. I think your shame and covering up of the subject speaks volumes.

I wasn't shamed, I was originally going to try to imply that the gay skeleton was into diapers as a joke, but when someone rigorously goes after every account you have on the internet to prove someone NO ONE even thought of to make a false accusation that could ruin someone's life forever, it makes sense I would defend myself

Also, I mean normal as in completely not-sexual

[absurDISM]

Originally posted by Cocyx The Gay Skeleton:

Originally posted by Snippy the Lizard:

Abdl is completely different than being a pedophile but you seem very determined to paint me as such so whatever
Also, those are both my OCs, they're of age.

But it *was* normal. Once again I can link the original image to show that it was fine

THOSE ARE YOUR OC'S???? YOU HAVE A BABY OC?

> "they're of age"
Can you not read???? Or do you think everyone that's short is an infant???

[Cocyx The Gay Skeleton]

Originally posted by Snippy the Lizard:

Originally posted by Cocyx The Gay Skeleton:

THOSE ARE YOUR OC'S???? YOU HAVE A BABY OC?

> "they're of age"
Can you not read????

that's a baby though. wym

[SHUFFLE𝗥𝗨𝗦𝗛̲̳̳̳]

Originally posted by Snippy the Lizard:

Originally posted by SHUFFLE𝗥𝗨𝗦𝗛̲̳̳̳:

Normal in what context? Most reasonable people consider ABDL to be pedo-adjacent. I think your shame and covering up of the subject speaks volumes.

I wasn't shamed, I was originally going to try to imply that the gay skeleton was into diapers as a joke, but when someone rigorously goes after every account you have on the internet to prove someone NO ONE even thought of to make a false accusation that could ruin someone's life forever, it makes sense I would defend myself

Also, I mean normal as in completely not-sexual

I've never accused you of anything, I just simply pointed out that you were lying about a diaper fetish from your very public furaffinity account, after being so open about your vore fetish. The cub art is a natural extension to why you were lying about it. Whether or not you're into sexualized versions of that is up in the air, there's no solid evidence either way.

[absurDISM]

Originally posted by Cocyx The Gay Skeleton:

Originally posted by Snippy the Lizard:

> "they're of age"
Can you not read????

that's a baby though. wym

It is not. If you really think that a short person is a baby then I don't know what to tell you. They just drew them very short so he could hold them easier

[SHUFFLE𝗥𝗨𝗦𝗛̲̳̳̳]

Originally posted by Cocyx The Gay Skeleton:

Originally posted by Snippy the Lizard:

> "they're of age"
Can you not read????

that's a baby though. wym

I believe it's the same situation as the 1000 year old witch loli's from anime.

[Cocyx The Gay Skeleton]

Originally posted by Snippy the Lizard:

Originally posted by Cocyx The Gay Skeleton:

that's a baby though. wym

It is not. If you really think that a short person is a baby then I don't know what to tell you. They just drew them very short so he could hold them easier

the character is in a diaper and the other character is literally calling him a baby lol

[Cocyx The Gay Skeleton]

Originally posted by SHUFFLE𝗥𝗨𝗦𝗛̲̳̳̳:

Originally posted by Cocyx The Gay Skeleton:

that's a baby though. wym

I believe it's the same situation as the 1000 year old witch loli's from anime.

oh that makes sense

[absurDISM]

Originally posted by SHUFFLE𝗥𝗨𝗦𝗛̲̳̳̳:

Originally posted by Snippy the Lizard:

I wasn't shamed, I was originally going to try to imply that the gay skeleton was into diapers as a joke, but when someone rigorously goes after every account you have on the internet to prove someone NO ONE even thought of to make a false accusation that could ruin someone's life forever, it makes sense I would defend myself

Also, I mean normal as in completely not-sexual

I've never accused you of anything, I just simply pointed out that you were lying about a diaper fetish from your very public furaffinity account, after being so open about your vore fetish. The cub art is a natural extension to why you were lying about it. Whether or not you're into sexualized versions of that is up in the air, there's no solid evidence either way.

"I've never accused you of anything"

Originally posted by SHUFFLE𝗥𝗨𝗦𝗛̲̳̳̳:

Originally posted by Snippy the Lizard:

That would be horrendous if that was a thing I actually favorited but ok

Fascinating, you just unfavorited it, so you're inadvertently admitting to covering up a cub fetish. I guess you've never heard of the Streisand effect.[en.wikipedia.org]

I was on the fence about you being sincerely into underaged characters until you tried to cover it up.

but you did??? that's the ENTIRE REASON I've been doing this?

[absurDISM]

Originally posted by Cocyx The Gay Skeleton:

Originally posted by Snippy the Lizard:

It is not. If you really think that a short person is a baby then I don't know what to tell you. They just drew them very short so he could hold them easier

the character is in a diaper and the other character is literally calling him a baby lol

I don't think you understand what teasing someone is but alright

[absurDISM]

Originally posted by Cocyx The Gay Skeleton:

Originally posted by SHUFFLE𝗥𝗨𝗦𝗛̲̳̳̳:

I believe it's the same situation as the 1000 year old witch loli's from anime.

oh that makes sense

Do you need me to share other art of my character to prove they aren't a child, as much as you want to continue this fake claim

[SHUFFLE𝗥𝗨𝗦𝗛̲̳̳̳]

Originally posted by Snippy the Lizard:

Originally posted by SHUFFLE𝗥𝗨𝗦𝗛̲̳̳̳:

I've never accused you of anything, I just simply pointed out that you were lying about a diaper fetish from your very public furaffinity account, after being so open about your vore fetish. The cub art is a natural extension to why you were lying about it. Whether or not you're into sexualized versions of that is up in the air, there's no solid evidence either way.

"I've never accused you of anything"

Originally posted by SHUFFLE𝗥𝗨𝗦𝗛̲̳̳̳:

Fascinating, you just unfavorited it, so you're inadvertently admitting to covering up a cub fetish. I guess you've never heard of the Streisand effect.[en.wikipedia.org]

I was on the fence about you being sincerely into underaged characters until you tried to cover it up.

but you did??? that's the ENTIRE REASON I've been doing this?

Being "sincerely into underaged characters" doesn't mean it has to be sexual.

[Cocyx The Gay Skeleton]

Originally posted by Snippy the Lizard:

Originally posted by Cocyx The Gay Skeleton:

oh that makes sense

Do you need me to share other art of my character to prove they aren't a child, as much as you want to continue this fake claim

god no i can barely stomach this convo

[absurDISM]

Originally posted by SHUFFLE𝗥𝗨𝗦𝗛̲̳̳̳:

Originally posted by Snippy the Lizard:

"I've never accused you of anything"

but you did??? that's the ENTIRE REASON I've been doing this?

Being "sincerely into underaged characters" doesn't mean it has to be sexual.

No, you directly implied that there, don't try to backpedal on it