Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Edit: Okay, noticed he's comparing the two remastered versions. Which is weird because both look the same to me.
I thought they would have looked the same, using the same technology and rendering for both games, given their both remastered, just thought they would use the same graphics upgrades for both games.
Not on the videos that were just uploaded last night on YT, probably one of the paid promoters for it, there's definitely a very noticeable difference between them.
Link? the game has a toggle between Remastered and original sprites, so it's possible the video could have been showing the difference
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SR_bVUJltf8
Red Alert
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQy4akM5kxs
C&C
I mean we're looking at still images which are zoomed in and could have been captured at any resolution vs a 1080p gameplay and map editor video. I highly doubt RA assets will be of lower quality
Very true!