update on update

[jarek.luberek]

its gonna be update 1.0 as devs said it gets out of beta and its 50% complete , u guys got patience for a other year ?

[M&M]

At the end of the day, do we pressure the devs to release an update which has a multitude of bugs, which overall ruin the game? Or wait a little longer for a update which may ultimately change how the user may apply their godly powers onto their worlds? One must ponder.

[CodeMineBlox101]

Originally posted by M&M:

At the end of the day, do we pressure the devs to release an update which has a multitude of bugs, which overall ruin the game? Or wait a little longer for a update which may ultimately change how the user may apply their godly powers onto their worlds? One must ponder.

Godly things to ponder, hmmm....

[VanCro7]

Another year of waiting for the update , no, I have no patience for that. If it really takes that long I will lose all interest in it. Lets hope the other 50% will go smoother and that the hard part is finished with.

[Tawnylure]

Originally posted by M&M:

At the end of the day, do we pressure the devs to release an update which has a multitude of bugs, which overall ruin the game? Or wait a little longer for a update which may ultimately change how the user may apply their godly powers onto their worlds? One must ponder.

Seems majority want the rushed out buggy update.
Which I really hope the developer DOESN'T do. As then it'll only make the children who lack critical thinking to realize it was their fault, and instead complain about the update they where complaining about not being released.
It's kinda just a endless cycle with games that have a majority child audience. Children complain -> dev rushes update -> children complain buggy update -> developer takes time fixing update -> children complain no content update. Rinse and repeat.

Anyways, hope the update is good. And uh, not rushed out. Let the developers take their time. Otherwise you're going to get rushed out, unpolished, buggy updates. Which no one likes, nor wants.
Like yeah, dev could probably communicate better, but they've always done this style of communication, and hell, its better than the valve communication- wait, valve doesn't do that. Haha.

[Mister Teteng]

Originally posted by Tawnylure:

Originally posted by M&M:

At the end of the day, do we pressure the devs to release an update which has a multitude of bugs, which overall ruin the game? Or wait a little longer for a update which may ultimately change how the user may apply their godly powers onto their worlds? One must ponder.

Seems majority want the rushed out buggy update.
Which I really hope the developer DOESN'T do. As then it'll only make the children who lack critical thinking to realize it was their fault, and instead complain about the update they where complaining about not being released.
It's kinda just a endless cycle with games that have a majority child audience. Children complain -> dev rushes update -> children complain buggy update -> developer takes time fixing update -> children complain no content update. Rinse and repeat.

Anyways, hope the update is good. And uh, not rushed out. Let the developers take their time. Otherwise you're going to get rushed out, unpolished, buggy updates. Which no one likes, nor wants.
Like yeah, dev could probably communicate better, but they've always done this style of communication, and hell, its better than the valve communication- wait, valve doesn't do that. Haha.

Name three games that have buggy updates because the players wanted them to release it early

[JezzDawga]

Originally posted by Mister Teteng:

Originally posted by Tawnylure:

Seems majority want the rushed out buggy update.
Which I really hope the developer DOESN'T do. As then it'll only make the children who lack critical thinking to realize it was their fault, and instead complain about the update they where complaining about not being released.
It's kinda just a endless cycle with games that have a majority child audience. Children complain -> dev rushes update -> children complain buggy update -> developer takes time fixing update -> children complain no content update. Rinse and repeat.

Anyways, hope the update is good. And uh, not rushed out. Let the developers take their time. Otherwise you're going to get rushed out, unpolished, buggy updates. Which no one likes, nor wants.
Like yeah, dev could probably communicate better, but they've always done this style of communication, and hell, its better than the valve communication- wait, valve doesn't do that. Haha.

Name three games that have buggy updates because the players wanted them to release it early

Thrive by Revolutionary Games ( https://revolutionarygamesstudio.com/devblog-38-to-the-future-and-back/ )
FNAF Security Breach (Fury's Rage was made because of how many people were demanding SB)
Cyberpunk 2077

What do I win?

[L-laine]

Is the dev even alive anymore??

[Casual Amateur]

Originally posted by JezzDawga:

Originally posted by Mister Teteng:

Name three games that have buggy updates because the players wanted them to release it early

Thrive by Revolutionary Games (https://revolutionarygamesstudio.com/devblog-38-to-the-future-and-back/)
FNAF Security Breach (Fury's Rage was made because of how many people were demanding SB)
Cyberpunk 2077

What do I win?

Hmm........ Let check those game for fun. On Cyberpunk 2077 from what I hear was..... Fans didn't rushed dev on releasing the game earlyer. There was few reddit thread claim that fan force dev to rush early was a lies. Also Cyberpunk 2077 was delay a lot of times. But Dev want to release it near holidays for XMAS.

Five Night At Freddy Security Breach: fans ranting about game delay 2 times by deadline and also Dev notice that their game was a lot bigger then they expect it. This seem like one of it that fans cause it. (Also I find few people actually enjoy buggy mess)

As for your third game. That link act as if was like a virus that stop me going into it. Also I was unable find any thing relate to it on search.

[JezzDawga]

Originally posted by Mossy Mushroom:

Originally posted by JezzDawga:

Thrive by Revolutionary Games (https://revolutionarygamesstudio.com/devblog-38-to-the-future-and-back/)
FNAF Security Breach (Fury's Rage was made because of how many people were demanding SB)
Cyberpunk 2077

What do I win?

Hmm........ Let check those game for fun. On Cyberpunk 2077 from what I hear was..... Fans didn't rushed dev on releasing the game earlyer. There was few reddit thread claim that fan force dev to rush early was a lies. Also Cyberpunk 2077 was delay a lot of times. But Dev want to release it near holidays for XMAS.

Five Night At Freddy Security Breach: fans ranting about game delay 2 times by deadline and also Dev notice that their game was a lot bigger then they expect it. This seem like one of it that fans cause it. (Also I find few people actually enjoy buggy mess)

As for your third game. That link act as if was like a virus that stop me going into it. Also I was unable find any thing relate to it on search.

Google "thrive revolutionary games", it's the top result.
or.....
https://store.steampowered.com/app/1779200/Thrive/

Cyberpunk was delayed, meaning it was before a confirmed deadline, and not many players want that to happen.

If you have any other suggestions, go for it. I really don't care about this seriously, I just wanted to say to that one guy that yes, it does actually happen.

[PringlessMan(9001)]

Originally posted by VanCro7:

Another year of waiting for the update , no, I have no patience for that. If it really takes that long I will lose all interest in it. Lets hope the other 50% will go smoother and that the hard part is finished with.

I agree with the second half. I hope the harder part of the content update is complete. Of course we must not pressure the dev to rush the update, or else we will get a buggy and messy update.

[Casual Amateur]

Originally posted by JezzDawga:

Google "thrive revolutionary games", it's the top result.
or.....
https://store.steampowered.com/app/1779200/Thrive/

Cyberpunk was delayed, meaning it was before a confirmed deadline, and not many players want that to happen.

If you have any other suggestions, go for it. I really don't care about this seriously, I just wanted to say to that one guy that yes, it does actually happen.

There no information about Cyberpunk dev agree to rush game by this fans complain. As far I find out that dev don't talk about fans whining. As you want to believe it happen. So I won't count this for Cyberpunk 2077. As much as I can find is a just a debunked on fans wanting a rush the dev making the game. It very likely that Dev didn't pay attend to this unknown person.

Some thing about Thrive. I was not able to find any thing about fans wanting to rush release it. At all. Only few thing I finding was people asking for update and none of it were about rushing it.

At less Five Night of Freddy Security Breach have debate about who should be blame for rushing the game.

Unless all the information were delete that can be the only reason.

[JezzDawga]

Originally posted by Mossy Mushroom:

Originally posted by JezzDawga:

Google "thrive revolutionary games", it's the top result.
or.....
https://store.steampowered.com/app/1779200/Thrive/

Cyberpunk was delayed, meaning it was before a confirmed deadline, and not many players want that to happen.

If you have any other suggestions, go for it. I really don't care about this seriously, I just wanted to say to that one guy that yes, it does actually happen.

There no information about Cyberpunk dev agree to rush game by this fans complain. As far I find out that dev don't talk about fans whining. As you want to believe it happen. So I won't count this for Cyberpunk 2077. As much as I can find is a just a debunked on fans wanting a rush the dev making the game. It very likely that Dev didn't pay attend to this unknown person.

Some thing about Thrive. I was not able to find any thing about fans wanting to rush release it. At all. Only few thing I finding was people asking for update and none of it were about rushing it.

At less Five Night of Freddy Security Breach have debate about who should be blame for rushing the game.

Unless all the information were delete that can be the only reason.

For Thrive, I literally linked (and have since fixed the link) DevBlog 38 which reads:

"With the release of all prototypes, the player can now reach the very end of the game, so long as they don’t mind a bare-bones experience of course! These skeletal stages serve as a pale representation of the future to come..."

For the rest, okay ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I'm not going to continue discussing this further and I really do not care if I changed your opinion or not.

[KirkataThePickaxe]

Well its what it is.

[Casual Amateur]

Originally posted by JezzDawga:

For Thrive, I literally linked (and have since fixed the link) DevBlog 38 which reads:

"With the release of all prototypes, the player can now reach the very end of the game, so long as they don’t mind a bare-bones experience of course! These skeletal stages serve as a pale representation of the future to come..."

For the rest, okay ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I'm not going to continue discussing this further and I really do not care if I changed your opinion or not.

You know what I find funny about this. Also kind a amusing. I didn't think you actually disprove about quickly release game will be aways bad game. You basically tell me that Thrive player base enjoy it any way. So bascially rush game not always a bad game.

Kind a think of it. About Update from Dev. It could mean another way. This bascially only telling me that the Dev only rushing it. Dev didn't say any thing about people whining for quicker update.

Do keep in mind that. When you said that you don't care. You shouldn't reply any more. If you keep replying... It kind a meaningless.

[thats crazy]

50%