安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
" comes along and ruins it. 
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
I learn something every day.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunpowder_artillery_in_the_Middle_Ages
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunpowder
https://blog.ansi.org/calcium-oxide-quicklime-history-warfare-uses/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Crécy
Now you learned something new
Was it a High explosive being used? No it was shelling by cannon.
Was it useful? As a spook tactic, as well as morale deterrent.
Did they use it often?
no
Was it a war winning method?
No but it helped strike fear in most cases
Most cases the ""mystics"" were still seeking immortality by swallowing the stuff especially in Asia (feel free to google it using government historical archives).
It wasn't used "Often" as a practical war tool but it was used across the globe, unlike many school goers were taught.
It was more used in digging the castle walls more than it ever was used in person to person combat "But it was used".
it's just that your argument makes no sense, especially when put with the quote you used.
The quote is about that there is no reason the civilizations should be stuck in the medieval era.
Your answer to that is "they had bombs in the medieval era", and so what? How does that changes the fact they don't have to be stuck in the medieval era?
If your argument on the other hand is that they don't need a modern era because the technological level they have, especially bombs were already in the medieval era, well...
They'd still need to be way past that era to use the nuclear bomb that is in the game.
Just in case, since you are so good at history, atomic research began to be a huge thing, especially in radioactivity in the beginning of XIX°c to the early XX°c, that's just a little more than 500 years after the end of the middle ages, which is only half the duration of said era.
Once again, the main point of the thread is not so much about if a modern era has to be added to the game, but about the stupid arguments that are made against a potential modern era.
Because a technology existed before doesn't impede progress, in case you didn't notice, we have planes nowadays, yet the first 'transport' by air in Europe was done in 1783, as you can see, it didn't prevent humanity to go in space centuries later.
So, how is the fact that explosives and gunpowder existed in the middle ages an argument against the modern era?
Well, maybe I greatly misunderstood you in which case I apologize, but it doesn't seem to be the case?
my point is if kings win wars, stole information and people related to higher advances than their own tech, then naturally over time you would have more advanced civ simply by the willingness of those acquired people to naturally survive.
If we see mages and dissect or absorb their structure and scripture they would overtime understand greater magics into science even levy from capturing enemies. However we have a death only structure, which just makes World Box more like a Sim-Ant than a world builder sandbox.
Lets place this vs this, ah that's boring; proceeds to blow it up.
there isn't much worth 15-20$ compared to Hero's Hour which focuses on 1/2 of the rest of what world box could take advantage of.
its class defined not experience defined.
Shadowrun.
However, despite how some people may want "real world modern" eras, the developers may not want that for the game. And that, alone, is enough of a reason to keep it in a high fantasy setting. (And for the record, guns existed in the medieval period. This period is a very broad swath of time ranging roughly from the 5th century CE to the 15th century... Guns were invented roughly in 840CE in China and spread by the 13th century.)
And once again, the argument isn't really about bringing modern era to the game but about the arguments made against, like this :
And for the record, guns existed in the medieval period. This period is a very broad swath of time ranging roughly from the 5th century CE to the 15th century... Guns were invented roughly in 840CE in China and spread by the 13th century.)
For the record, atomic bombs, TNT and death laser ray didn't exist in the medieval era.