Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That being said, you'll be using a lot less capacity so you can go scarf up some more territory.
just my opinion:
it depents on how you want to look at it.
adding those 3 countries (if all 3 still exist) gives you
a smallish amount of new people
it will mozt lilkly reduce your education level (if it is still below 10, it might increate your requierment for spoil)
it will increase your GDP (while still reducing your per capita GDP)
it might increase your ineqality and unrest (unless you preped those countries befor)
all in itself might not be woth the cost:
you need to control those countries for maybe 1-3 years to integrate them (make them allies, federate them and so on)
but here is what it gives you in the long run:
investmentpoints is based on GDP, which is based on per capita GDP and your overall pop.
runing economy in a high pop country is in many cases more usefull than in low pop areas (there are more variables, but i believe, even those should be high in the EU country) and as far as i saw, investing in knowledge in rich/high pop countries is worth more.
it gives you more controll over pop, finances and so on with only a minor increase in controllpoints
unite those into EU, and i believe you may get your investment back over the long run, but if you are way to close to your controllpoint cap, you might not want to hold 3 low paying countries. (turkey has at least some funds and tech... but looking at armenia...)
and starting a war to get them might be even worse... attacking belarus or amenia might call russia into the war and... hello nukes!
I never understood this logic. You can just take control of russia. And then you can either give europa or russia the countries. Or you take control of belarus and just leave the russian union and switch over to europa. You rarely have to make a war in this game.
Yeah, Russia isn't so bad.
The nightmare is Servants fully entrenched in China, and not biting the bullet and eating a few nukes straight away to get them out. Once they've started building nukes then you're in trouble, lol.