安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
Exactly my point. Without highly annoying, superduper-DRM SC = INSTABUY.
With = NEVERBUY. But R* NEVER listens.
A paradox is a statement or a situation that seems self-contradictory or logically impossible. So, if you tell someone, 'I don't care if you get that thing,' it's strange because you wouldn't talk let alone try to convey your opinion about it if you really didn't care. So, the paradox is that your words don't match how you feel.
Hope you learned something today!
Ya, no your entire premise is flawed. Me telling him no one cares if he buys it or not, does not denote any measurement of care.
I think your confusing situations where people reply passionately about something. For instance if i was telling him why he should buy it, that perhaps may fit. But what your thinking about is something more akin to me saying i dont care about his opinion then continuing to respond to his opinion. That is not what happened here.
So you need to rethink your failed logic. I find it extra hilarious you think your dropping wisdom and your not even on base.
Steam does sell DRM-free games, the kind of games that doesn't need a launcher to be launchable? And the Steam DRM is just there for the services to work, compare to the authorization system(DRM) is using which doesn't benefit consumers whatsoever.
Steam is more of a client than a DRM.
Their launcher is one thing, the DRM that they use with this game that turn it into a partially alway-online is another thing, which is terrible and people like OP want it gone.
Your comment is actual pettiness, just like the previous comment that I responded to.
It's used for the SocialClub friends services and alike, along with game progress & achievements.
"Everyone have internet connection" doesn't the DRMs have to work that way.
About the services, steam also have those, but at least the social club does give you something, the online activation just suck.
And there are Steam Achievements.
nothing more.
The launcher is there because Rockstar has their own Online Games Store. So how can they just get rid of the Launcher DRM and such just because the game is on say; EPIC, GOG or STEAM? It still needs that. It was designed to use it from the very beginning before RDR2 was offered on 3rd party game stores/clients.
They even went and updated games like MP3, GTA4, GTA5 to use the same Launcher as well because all those other games had a different "thing" it used as a DRM. GTA4 was basically broken before they updated it to use this Launcher because GTA4 for the longest time required the Games of Windows Client, which died long before Win7 expired. GTA5 used some stand-alone SocialClub login thingy, so this Rockstar Launcher paved the way for them to have a Digital Downloads Games Store (for games like GTA Trilogy) as well as provided a fix for GTA4 so we could play it again, properly on Win10/11
Please stop acting like this is the plague; many of you seem to have no idea or some how forget how the Rockstar Games on PC were before this more modern Launcher DRM.
Like I said, it's ridiculous to force their own launcher into a game they released on Steam, since Steam is already enough, at least they should give us an option to launch the game without their launcher running. It was ridiculous back then and it still is now.
Another problem with the DRMs in this game is that they're using an machines activation system like Denuvo, the activation can be expired or break under circumstances.
You need to ask for permission to play the game you purchased, that's definitely not OK.