Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
im not basing this off my winning odds and I don't expect to win anyway. I simply feel as though the card distribution feels odd. As in, for any given card, the chance is not an even 1/52 to draw it.
It also helps to learn other people's habits. In camp, Susan never bluffs, Uncle bluffs a lot, and Pearson does, too, with big bets late in the hand.
I have said multiple times that it is not the losing that's the issue... i am losing my mind
You said that cards don't seem to be coming up with 1/52 probability. Sounds like maybe 1/52 is a smaller probability than you realize.
edit: to clarify i mean i dont know specifically how it feels off rather that it does, in general.
One thing I think I figured out is that other players play as tho all the cards are in their hand, so if there's a pair on the table, they bet as if nobody else knows about it. If that makes sense. Ie, they'll bet higher holding 2 pair, even if one of the pairs is on the table, and ergo, in everybody's hand.
I know i'm jumping in like 2 days late, but whatever...
1. There is absolutely no way to know the answer to ur question without...
a. looking through the game code and finding the complete set of gameplay code and any related equations (all currently stored as a binary for our gaming pleasure), or,
b. hearing the facts directly from the developer.
Since neither is likely to happen on a "Steam" forum, then you are not likely to receive a satisfactory answer here, but lots of anecdotal feedback.
With that said, here's what i have noticed... (anecdotal feedback, commencing)
The first hand of poker at Flatneck Station, immediately after finding the Reverand, will always be the same.
After that hand, every hand does appear to be random - meaning that every hand appears to meet my expectations for random card distribution. There does not appear to be any bias in the game regarding which cards are offered to which players.
However, what has completely surprised me in the game is that each NPC player at the table can have different betting criteria - meaning that some NPCs will bet rather daringly and other NPCs will bet conservatively - and oddly enough, some NPCs are always one way or the other, or they are more randomly daring or conservative.
So, the weirdest thing i had to adjust to in each game is to first find out which player is betting daringly and which player is betting conservatively (if any) - the daring NPC can usually be beaten with a modest hand, but the conservative NPC will often have a great hand.
Thus, you need to study the other players and learn their strategy.
But i don't think the game is biased against the player in any way that i can notice.
a person might be really good at reading a human, but a.i. often react in weird ways. . .however, a.i.i do tend to be more predictable, if one understands how the a.i. algorithm is set.
sometimes devs will program "tells" in a.i. opponents. if you can identify these "tells", maybe it will make it easier.
I myself was always baffled as how people can play poker online with their faces obscured by an avatar, and how some people seemed to still always know when i was bluffing. . .
Like fights have literally broken out and people have died over a game of cards during this era lol.
"YOU CHEAT!, die you son a ♥♥♥♥♥!"