安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Although IF there will a remake it's still a question IF and WHEN will it come to PC.
I would gladly play this game to learn about John Marston's next chapter, but to be honest I'm not holding my breath for it.
I don't agree with this. First of all, they don't have to relese multiplayer part in the RDR1 remaster. Only the story mode, and leave RDO from RDR2 as primary multiplayer component for RDR series.
And even if it RDR1 remaster would include multiplayer, I don't really believe that it if hurt them MUCH financially. I was actually surprised how easy it is to progress without grinding in RDO and without spending real cash. Are there so many people who actually pay for this stuff that can be easily obtained for free with a little bit of creativity (treasure maps, daily challanges streaks etc.)?
With this logic - why they did release RDR2 on PC then? Plus we are talking about a remaster that would be primarely done for the next gen consoles and possibly after some time would get a PC version too, like RDR2 did.
This sentence is misleading because you disguise an opinion (assumption) as a fact.
I have no idea if any of that has any validity, but I'd say your best bet at playing the original RDR on PC is to emulate it via RPCS3.
"Yeah? Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man."
And that's what I don't agree with. I can also recall that there were same bold claims saying that RDR2 is never coming to PC. For sure. 100%.
Like I said - the propability that they will do a RDR1 remaster for consoles is pretty high IN MY OPINION. The chance that there would be also a PC version in such case is not as high, but still there.
The code of RDR1 is irrelevant, becasue I was talking about a remaster made with RDR2 engine.
Ok. I won't. As a matter of fact, I'm going to unsubscribe this thread becasue this exchange is totally pointless.
Wiki, Polygon, Fandom, CBR and many others that I JUST Googled, are just some outlets that state both games in the same universe. Some of those articles even have quotes. I don't even know why I have to provide the evidence here. Even both games are trademarked under the same franchise if you look, and they share the same locations. I don't even need to prove it because it's Rockstar's stance. It's factual, documented, and even legally bound to be true. Why is it that crazy to believe? It's just both games are in the world same world at different parts and times.
However, this thread got me interested in how Red Dead Revolver was connected to Red Dead Redemption and here’s what I discovered:
- - - - - - - - - -
Red Dead Revolver was built by Angel Studios for Capcom, but the game had a troubled development. Capcom and Angel Studios couldn’t agree on which direction to take the game.
Rockstar was impressed with Angel Studios’ game engine, and so purchased the studio and negotiated with Capcom to get the rights to Red Dead Revolver as part of the purchase. Capcom was ready to walk away from the troubled project and let Rockstar have it (although Capcom retained the right to publish Red Dead Revolver in Japan if the game ever got finished.)
The game was ‘in-pieces’ when Rockstar acquired it, and so they budgeted the team 9 months to ‘stitch-everything-together’ and release it.
The end product wasn’t quite what Rockstar had hoped for, but they recognized it was the best they could do with the fragments they began with. With the development of Red Dead Revolver finished, they were eager to start working on another Red Dead Title but this time as an open-world.
This game became the first Red Dead Redemption.
So while Red Dead Redemption was the first title to be free of any influence from Capcom, I do see it as part of the “Red Dead” franchise. (Rockstar did acquire the rights to the ‘Red Dead’ trademark as part of their acquisition of Angel Studios.)
However, Red Dead Redemption definitely takes place in it’s own continuity that’s separate from Red Dead Revolver’s. It’s more of a ‘spiritual successor’ rather than a direct sequel.
- - - - - - - - - -
That’s what my research uncovered. Did I get something wrong? If I did lemmie know! :3
I dont remember where I saw it but I read something i think last year that they are working on a remastered version of RDR1?