Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I like this game as well though it's not what the people raved about. I agree with you about the 2020 lens instead of trying to recreate how people interacted in 1899 but then even few Americans could pull that off let alone a European dev team.
Despite enjoying the game for what it is, here are the main points that would make it MUCH better for me;
1. Don't force a story arch, let us make our own character and as what we want to play (I'll get to online in a moment). I don't like being forced to play a character with a set personality.
2. Don't lock items behind a 'level' or having completed a mission; like weapons, clothing, and especially a simple fishing rod. That's just annoying and supports the fixed story arch.
3. Fixed mission progressions...bad and again enforces the fixed story arch. It's more like an interactive story than an open world. It's NOT an open world when you transition to cinematic sections that lead you by your nose and dump you into a situation where you have to find the very specific action to succeed.
4. Online; This is REALLY bad. Forcing players into a peer-to-peer lobby with strangers without an option to create a private lobby for solo play or play with trusted friends is just horrible internet security. I could imagine getting past the first three compaints if I could play alone or with friends in a private online lobby for some brain dead reason Rockstar doesn't give us that option.
see, the thing is, I don't think rockstar did all of this on purpose, and having been in the software development industry, I can tell you that bad management can destroy and deter good things from happening in so many ways.
However, if they did do all of these things I'm calling problems on purpose, then that means a "AAA" studio made a *huge* budget game, and even had crunch time, to appeal to a niche audience that they hadn't even identified while making the product. I don't think any company is that artsy and willing to take that kind of commercial risk, even though it's the case that rockstar could afford it.
I think this game was the product of poor management and maybe even devs with the wrong mindset making it. Again, there is nothing that could happen in the game at this point for me to go to a 5/10, and it could sink a lot deeper here.
I'm not even sure what the deal is with this story, but based on the comment above yours, it sounds like it's worse than I thought. My question now is: why is this an open world game, but they're trying to do this (poor executed) linear story. I genuinely do not understand what they're doing. There are missions that say you're going to do one thing, then dump you off with your health meters gimped (like the mission where you go drinking with the black who's staying in your camp), then it tells you to rest to restore a very low meter, and it didn't even work when I did it, and this is where I discovered the aforementioned area-based resting function. Jeez, that is *horrible* design that can be fixed in a Remaster. This game is all over with the presentation. It looks like the project changed hands 15 times during development and 3 different teams cobbled together several different systems per team. It's bad. Plain and simple, and I'm shocked that I didn't hear any of this until I went to search online for what to do; this just speaks to the level of censorship on the internet these days. Back on the story though, I do not believe i'm in the year 1899 anymore, there are too many "we're in the year 2020 moments", and it's pretty obvious. they're even making a showcase out of it over and over and over and over again. What's the point in saying it's the year 1899 if it's not 1899? To deceive young people for political purposes? That's is the single result I can think of here.
There are 1000 games to play and you play a game you dislike. Cant be a normal person..bunch of sadists
And also..cyberpunk has literally zero decision impacts in the entire game lmfao..yet you like that terrible game 😂😂
But GaMiNg iSnT SuPpoSeEdDd To bE FuN U hAVE 2 StOp ThAT mANN
(i agree with ya)
I'm using a trainer now to fast forward through the travel times (you can set it to 10x the speed if you want). I didn't mind it, but when missions fail due to bullsh*t or my horse glitches into something and dies I get pretty pissed off. I also turned on unlimited cores to bypass that incredibly stupid element of the game. I was having to spend all my money on food for my horse and I, and I wasn't even full up. Then I got attacked coming out of my camp in this condition and used every last thing I had and was worse off than before. And for whatever reason the $600 I got after killing everyone in that o'driscal camp isn't in my money pool, and it didn't go in the donation box in the camp so Idk what happened but I used the trainer to give myself that money and i don't see a reason for items in the game any more so I'll probably just put unlimited items on now.
I'm serious about a less than 5/10. the game play is not good, and other games have done what this game is trying to do and they did it better. san andreas is a better game than this. this game is an HD texture mod with work done on smooth animations, and I never cared about graphics. Again, with the story, it's 2018 political propaganda with a western theme, rather than a western rpg in 1899. What is left in the game to say it's above average? Where would those points come from? And if this is the best game in 2 years, then I might as well just not look at other games, because I'm returning to gaming after a 10 year hiatus and this is simply bad. I'm guessing you're about 20 years old or something if you think this is a good game; try going back to games before 2007, or even better 2004, and compare them to what you have now, and then tell me if these improvements look like 13+ years worth of progress. They're not and these supposed "Aaa" studios are squeezing out turds like this game.
The environments look decent in this game, but I can go see that on my property in real life if I want that, and sometimes the textures for trees degrade into something that looks like it's straight out of serious sam 1.... this is not a "good" game by any metric to me. and it's not worth half the $40 asking price on steam right now
Maybe I'll come back later, but I have a huge library of 20 year old games I can be playing instead of this trash video game... holy crap my mind is blown by all the hype that I heard the past 2 years... how? I want to know who was hyped about which things in this game.
it seems like you are getting irritated about a whole lot of nothing while looking at older games with rose tinted glasses.
Money is not an issue in the game and managing your cores is neither neccessary nor hard if you decide to mess with them. Plain and simple: you are doing it wrong.
Your take on the story is again... nitpicky. If you have the same problems with movies being innacurate, sure rdr2 is pushing your buttons aswell but that is a specific you-problem again.
Considering anime a tad retarded, you don't see me watching one and then acting suprised about the nonsense i watched.
The point about the games look and how you have that in front of your door... well, maybe you should not play a game with this setting then? What kind of point are you trying to make here? procedurally generated? Really? Sorry but sometimes a few arguments are just so absolutely terrible that they can easily taint everything else you say.
What are these amazing games of the past?
Be glad that you haven't seen through the wispy story lines at the moment. It only feigns complexity and influence by the player.
Oh hell no, it would be exactly like this, possibly more bugs.