AMD 8350 nvidia 1080

[Tang60]

Im running the game great IMO, everything on ultra except advanced option thats on default.

Im getting average 28FPS really smooth. I dont have to have 60FPS to enjoy a game but it has to be smooth .

[Zaphre]

Originally posted by Tang60:

Im getting average 28FPS really smooth.

[jbscotchman]

I'm also running an AMD FX 8350 with a 1660 Ti. My average is around 56fps with Ultra/high settings at 1080p.

[Smokey]

Pro tip,lower your resolution to around 1440x900 for a massive fps boost since youre being bottlenecked. It might even let you up some graphical settings. Which in the end will make your game look and run better,the resolution change is something you will get used to pretty fast.

[𝓢𝒖𝒑𝒂𝓒𝓪𝓽]

gj bro, you getting same fps as PS4.

[Metadragon]

Serious question. I get that AMD processors are cheaper but there still that order of magnitude between them and Intel when i comes to gaming right? Why do people not go the extra mile for their CPU and go cheaper with their GPUs?

[jbscotchman]

Originally posted by Metadragon:

Serious question. I get that AMD processors are cheaper but there still that order of magnitude between them and Intel when i comes to gaming right? Why do people not go the extra mile for their CPU and go cheaper with their GPUs?

I've had this CPU since 2014. It was one of the best bang for your bucks CPU ever. In the next few months I'm gonna build a Ryzen 5 system.

[Super Bambaspis]

Originally posted by Metadragon:

Serious question. I get that AMD processors are cheaper but there still that order of magnitude between them and Intel when i comes to gaming right? Why do people not go the extra mile for their CPU and go cheaper with their GPUs?

It was the previous couple of lines of AMD processors that were bad for gaming (bulldozer and piledriver). The newer Ryzen AMD CPU's are just cheaper. That performance gap is gone.

OP has a the AMD 8350, a piledriver CPU. An ultra cheap, but also ultra bad, CPU (I had one for years).

[theddy]

this is beyond bottleneck.. why would you even pair those 2 up?

[Metadragon]

Originally posted by Bilbo Laggins:

Originally posted by Metadragon:

Serious question. I get that AMD processors are cheaper but there still that order of magnitude between them and Intel when i comes to gaming right? Why do people not go the extra mile for their CPU and go cheaper with their GPUs?

It was the previous couple of lines of AMD processors that were bad for gaming (bulldozer and piledriver). The newer Ryzen AMD CPU's are just cheaper. That performance gap is gone.

OP has a the AMD 8350, a piledriver CPU. An ultra cheap, but also ultra bad, CPU (I had one for years).

Ah is that right? I dont know much about the Ryzen line. I do know that this now old 6600k I have will survive until I replace my PC for anything I'd need. I guess its more about architecture.

But still idk. I still think that when going for CPU you should go all out and then you can debate GPUs since they are WAY easier to upgrade.

[Elsian]

Definitely look into getting rid of that FX-8350. Even without upgrading my 1060 6GB going from the 8350 to the Ryzen 5 2600X was a night and day difference in terms of performance.

[Tang60]

Originally posted by 𝓢𝒖𝒑𝒂𝓒𝓪𝓽:

gj bro, you getting same fps as PS4.

With ultra PC graphics, smooth as silk, yea thanks.

Bad cpu ? had it for years now, still giving me very playable gameplay .

[Venox]

Originally posted by Tang60:

Originally posted by 𝓢𝒖𝒑𝒂𝓒𝓪𝓽:

gj bro, you getting same fps as PS4.

With ultra PC graphics, smooth as silk, yea thanks.

Bad cpu ? had it for years now, still giving me very playable gameplay .

28fps aint smooth at all lmao. That's pretty much the definitiion of stutter.

[Spicy Messiah]

If my scientific calculator ran 28 FPS brand new, I'd chuck it out the window.

You can boost your performance as suggested above or by tweaking the settings, but if that is smooth to you, I guess you're set. However, in a game that relies on fluid action, capping yourself at barely base PS4 speeds (not even Pro) will eventually bite you in the rear. Consider trying to get 45+ by messing with the settings. You might sacrifice some bling but the performance improvement will make it play better in the long run.

[Tang60]

Originally posted by Venox:

Originally posted by Tang60:

With ultra PC graphics, smooth as silk, yea thanks.

Bad cpu ? had it for years now, still giving me very playable gameplay .

28fps aint smooth at all lmao. That's pretty much the definitiion of stutter.

That would be funny except youre wrong, it is smooth NO stutters.
If it was I could lower the settings, its on ultra.