Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
1. Do any of you (with excessive unpack times) consider your systems high-end?
2. Do you find games that stream textures (i.e. Open World) tend to stutter?
I know that my hardware is beyond what's necessary for gaming (this is my development machine), but am dumbfounded by just how slow this whole thing is going for some users. The difference is kind of like what you'd expect between 2 machines 10 years apart in age, not systems that meet the requirements to play this game.
Performance is always rattling around in the back of my mind, and I'd like to know whether it's storage or CPU that's causing the disparity here. Even the worst performing games that I've worked on haven't had this big a spread in reported performance between users.
But ok, whatever makes him sleep better.
Prob also one of the ones bragging on how great his rig is, must be his first build
For my part, it took around 25 mins. That's on an NVMe M.2 SSD (single, removed the raid 0 as it had very little effect according to CrystalDiskMark). I monitored with task manager, and noticed that it seemed to hog the CPU more than the disk. Due to the decompression, no doubt.
CPU is an i7-9750H (6/12 laptop CPU). CPU would often stay at 100% for a while.
Fairly sure it would have been faster on my desktop, but not sure by how much. Desktop has an i7 8700K, and maybe a slightly faster M.2 drive.
That's like saying you shouldn't play old games because they are old. Like playing dota 2.
First computer I had was a 386 laptop... I didn't games on the PC until i got a pentium and that was my first desktop, that 2MB video card rocked...
Might be mistaken, but I think my first one was a 286 actually. With a 5.25" floppy drive and no hard drive at all. Had 2 games for it, and they were awesome. Gato (u-boat sim) and Impossible Mission.
Looks like it, yeah. I would have bought the same laptop with an i9-9980HK, but sadly they were not available in my country. At any rate, it's benched better in some games than laptops with i9-9900K, so apart from some decent virtualization environments which I sometimes run, I wouldn't have benefited much.
Your post history shows differantly, but whatever you say.
Back to topic, I had paused my download this morning and when I resumed a few min. later I believe Steam unpacked it. Only about 70 gigs downloadd but after not even 5 min of disk usage and high cpu usage on this laptop it continued downloading.