Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
🙏namastè
You mean performance, not optimization. You tell quite a simplified story.
OP, it's not optimized well. Needs hardware that can strong arm its way to smooth performance. The range of performance is narrow too. The best you could hope for even with a strong PC is decent. GPUs more than a couple gens old will have issues. Weaker CPUs will struggle too.
Optmization is a smart word? I said it because Rock Star titles usually came as ports from console versions. At least this is what I hear people saying. So it`s a matter of how good they made the transfer for PC. And if it works good for those on the minimum specs range as well, you see?
Someone failed at school... "op op op optim optimization. Hey mum I did it! I did a big word!"
Pretty much. I`m a half-alphabetized Brazilian and I know what optimization is.
Thats irrelevant. Its over 5 years old at this point.
In RDR2, it will work reasonable. It will suck, because the GPU is a 3.5 year old entry-level PoS. But it will perform reasonably and as expected for an entry-level PoS GPU: not very well.
With a GTX 770 being min spec, a GTX 1050 is below min spec: https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-770-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1050/2174vs3650
They could take some of the GPU load off by using photo realistic graphics on still-pictures like house´s, tree lumbers, dirt, grass, rocks / stones, ground and wires and so on, stuff you know would take alot of GPU power to render in 3d .. you could even use it on still standing shadows to take some of the 3d rendering loads off the gpu ..
That would give the gpu more power to render moveing 3d objects in higher detailed graphics, such as moveing shadows, sun and lights ..
What's not optimized are users PCs. They buy high-end gear that they're unfamiliar with or don't know how to setup properly. And they all show up with very high expectations of what their PC can actually do.
Everything is controlled by marketing hype. Look at the boxes these GPUs come in. All over it says "dx 12" "OVERCLOCKER" "Ray trace" "get an edge"" lol these companies want you to believe that your machine is the fastest on the planet for every game. So what happens when it isn't? People complain, blaming optimization. Meanwhile, you could just tweak the 40-50 graphic settings and get it playable. But they won't because they paid a grip for their setup.
That's why I always use old ♥♥♥♥. The new ♥♥♥♥ is overhyped.
I just threw this cheap ♥♥♥♥ together this week and it runs the game beautifully:
Intel Xeon e3 v2 1230
8Gb dual-channel viper 3 series
GTX 1050ti
The "my GPU could handle this previous game so it should run *insert a whole new game*" is irrelevant. GTX 1050 is an entry level card that came out a year AFTER GTAV's pc release so it's only natural it'd give reasonable performance.
Then again, if you're willing to turn the settings down, you should be able to get fairly playable performance out of it, provided your other parts are up to the task.
https://youtu.be/g1VFXxv_19Q
https://youtu.be/FNy_j2MtwBo