安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
You never stated in the OP what was broken or the problems you encountered.
Yes i know there are bugs and glitches etc for quite a few people.
There is are also thousands (and prolly over 100.000) people that dont have problems.
Just on Steam RDR2 gets about 50K people online at peaks and then you have people playing through Epic and just Rockstar to, thats ALOT of people.
Buggy game? yes probably. Absolutely broken? nah absolutely not.
I never denied there arent problems for quite a few people.
Just your OP doesnt mention you speaking on the behalf of those people and/or you had problems with the game or not.
"Remember WB and Arkham Knight? That had a framerate issue but from reports we are seeing even worse framerate and freezes on RDR2!"
I thought this was maybe your problem.
The OP is a bit unclear in that regard.
The difference there is that they did all that _before_ they released the game. Ideally, all bugs would be fixed prior to a game's release, and of course, if you end up redesigning the game due to a bug, then that should be done prior to release. Obviously, it's not really feasible to find and fix _all_ bugs before a game is released, which is why pretty much every game ever has at least some bugs in it, and a big advantage of modern game distribution platforms is that they allow developers to easily release fixes for any further bugs that get found after the game's release. The problem is that game development studios and publishers (especially from AAA studios / publishers) have largely ended up taking the attitude that it's better to hit a particular release date than to make sure that the game is actually ready before releasing it. So, instead of only releasing the game once all of the bugs they could find were fixed, they release by a particular release date regardless of the game's state with the idea that they can just patch it later. RDR2 is just one more game in a long line of games in recent years where the publisher and/or development studio took this attitude, and so we got a really buggy release. There really is no excuse for having released the game in the state that they did.
The game is in a much better state than it was when it initially launched on PC. It still has way too many problems, but for many people, single player is now rock solid, whereas at launch, a large percentage of people couldn't even get the game to start. Of course, online is still a mess. Some people are able to get it to work consistently enough to have a great time playing it, but pretty much everyone is at minimum running into issues where the server kicks them out and frequently are having plenty of other problems as well.
So, Rockstar has reduced the number of issues that the game has, but it still has plenty more to go, and they should have fixed this stuff before releasing the game. In spite of being one of the best games in recent history, it's also one of the worst PC launches in recent history.
Also no single player DLC because they couldn't possibly spare some of the 100's of millions they get to make it. They only want to support the online and it's awful monetary schemes.
I do expect more from Rockstar, but I know I really shouldn't.
Oh don't let me forget how they broke GTA:SA with their update/remaster... Game black screens on certain missions, audio missing or stuttering, voice files mixed around, graphics are worse, textures are replaced with beta textures during cutscenes, saving issues, among many others. And that's an older game that WAS working pretty well before. And they screwed that up.
Do you not remember the ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ that was Arkham Knights PC release? The end result of that terrible port was to give all steam buyers free copies of the Arkham series (Asylum, City, etc) as well as an apology. Turns out that issue was caused by Warner Bros giving the porting job to 12 people from a company that only had experience in Mobile Porting and none of the titles were triple A.
Doesnt matter if i remember or not, different studio different publisher.
We might get something, we might not.
Hold ur horses (no pun) and wait patiently...... while i keep playing RDR2