Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Witcher is entirely open world wise and has a plethora of side quests and areas, along with the superior story. RDR2 is just poorer in comparison even with its supposed plus, not to mention you can actually play the game after launching it instead of having to deal with rockstars social club.
https://www.reddit.com/r/witcher/comments/371oyv/more_than_80_hours_played_finished_the_main_story/
Yes.
The Witcher has too many fantasy elements for my taste.
RDR does have Dead Eye which is sort of cheating but I much prefer the game play, both on-line and the SP story.
IMHO...
Hhahahahahha..
No.
I don't know who is more to blame, the people who blindly rush to buy a bugged game, or a lazy game company wanting to make a quick buck by exploiting stupid naïve young adults who WILL rush to buy a bugged game.
I'm sure RDR 2 is a great game. I've been waiting for it for some time (PC), but in all honesty I'm really sick and tired of this trend: games with bugs and glitches, and waiting months, or even years for the devs to fix it. Sometimes the game never gets (properly) fixed.
Anyway, whatever you decide, good luck!
in Red Redemption 2
is the Open World Like objects or people around you Smart or all are Scripted and will do the same thing again and again ?
Both are very great games, and with a different setting I find it really hard to compare them objectively. The Witcher might be more smooth in technical terms right now, but not on the scale when it'd really matter.
Well in Witcher 3 I can just run into a NPC house or shopkeep and loot all their items off the shelves and cabinets clean without them caring so. Can't pull that off in Red Dead.
If you haven't played W3 go for it cause you can get it for dirt cheap these days at a steep discount.
Of course, if you're looking for multiplayer, The Witcher 3 doesn't have that at all.
Ultimately, I'd say that while there are superficial similarities, The Witcher 3 and RDR2 are very different games. And even if they were both completely bug free, it would be pretty subjective as to which would be better.
However, unless someone is in hurry to play RDR2 online, if they're trying to choose between the two games, I'd just tell them to go play The Witcher 3 and come back and pick up RDR2 at some point in the future. They'll spend less money that way than if they did it the other way around, and RDR2 should be less buggy at that point. They could even just start with The Witcher 1 and work their way through the whole Witcher series before getting RDR2, though I'm sure that there are a lot of folks who love The Witcher 3 who wouldn't like the first game much. It's much older and pretty linear. It does give you a different perspective playing the third game though if you've already played the first two.