Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Dont forget my low ddr4 ram .... its 2x2 kits and only 3600 mhz.
Yeah thats why i share it. my complete system cost is around 800 Euros.
Its not inclueded my case XD my case was Cost 200 Euro at year 2009 XD
BUT the real Problem atm on FSR is. FSR NATIV AA cost more performence as TAA.
I get 10 fps more if i use the TAA, Anti Analiising. Same Problem in MH Wilds.
But otherwise u can get more as 60 fps with Balanced on 4k.
*edit
https://imgur.com/a/NYxN7Oa
here is it on 4k balanced
no FG / ultra settings
scene 1 63fps / scene 2 68 fps / scene 3 85 fps
Img quality wasent so bad as i think, but its only a bench we can not 100% check now.
Could you possibly be any me melodramatic?
I am well aware of Carmac's dated qoute/attempt to stay relevant. But I still fail to see what that has to do with the state of the GPU industry, as I mention below.
Your point is all over the place.
I will however play devils advocate to to some degree, and agree that the current state of the GPU industry is terrible. Like any company whose only real competition is itself Nvidia does as it pleases and prices as it pleases. Intel is new to the GPU game and will take some time become they an even come close to competing and AMD seems to love shooting itself in the proverbial foot every opportunity that presents.
Your're using FSR Upscaler. look at mine again. Those results are wil no upscale and no AI frame-gen. With upscale I average around 180-200 FPS.
If you use Lossless Scaling u get 300-400 fps btw wiht x4
its good or usefull is a other question XDD
GPUs are still measured by raw performance without AI "cheats". And if the raw performance of a game is sub 60, it is an optimisation issue.
But it's sadly the future. AI will probably generate games on the fly without anyone programming a game at some point. The whole creativity aspect of creating games will be gone because AI will print out games like a factory in the future.
CPU : 7800X3D
210FPS average @ 1440p
*slow clap*
I agree too but i didnt see it here.
this is a mid range gpu for 500 EURO // 7800 xt // i have no x3d cpu so i lose 10-20% performence!!!
Here wiht "lower" quality AA / TAA (its over 90 fps(indoor) and scene 3 is ovver 100 fps)
https://imgur.com/a/7Q63hpz
Here is the FSR NATIVE AA (its over 60 and in scence 3 i get 80)
https://imgur.com/a/igl5Hg0
I can not cheating, you see every setup in the picture. i dont use and Fake frames or upscaler and its ultra preset
If my lowly RX 6600 can do it ON Linux WITHOUT frame gen, then your fancy GPU can do it too, I think your PC is full of bloatware and you need to re-install drivers and clean it up.
I got 140 fps on average and my CPU is even slower than yours
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3435233857
well when you're top end is raking in 2G a pop.....yeah 600 - 700 is going to be mid...if not just above basement level. Problem is folks like me in the 3080rtx range...oie to get the 5070 or splurge for the 5090 and be done with it for another several years. Either way....it's more expensive than you want it to be.