Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This has a higher CPU spec recommendation that Red Dead Redemption 2 so.
High spec recommendations though? That worries me about optimisation, as the game certainly doesn't look as technically intensive as RDR2. not by a long shot.
Ive got 16gb ram, a 1070GTX but only a 4770k i7. Its the CPU part that worries me personally.
I hope so.
inb4 45 threads titled "why is FPS so shockingly bad??" :O
yep, its either that or "WHY STORY SO SHORT!!"
Im 100% sure.
Lol yeah.
Ive tried finding how long the devs estimated but I cant find the article. But anyhoo, even if they say 15-20 hours there will be people complaining they did it in 6 so.