Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The way it sounds this is the closest we will get to multiplayer, basically a fixed ship design and a leaderboard for whoever breaks a ship down the fastest or with some higher score likely based on how many parts were wasted/broken. I don't like leaderboards, if anyone remembers CreeperWorld 3 was infested with impossibly short times from cheaters on the hi-score board for each level.
finishing the game and adding more ships and content is way more important than coop right now IMO.
i don't mind they add Coop as DLC later but hell not now.
Maybe I'd feel like less of a puzzle I head into by myself and more of a job done by me and a friend/coworker.
This is the only leaving me on edge as to buy or not. Everything looks fantastic, and I might need to check some more gameplay to see if I'd be worth hoping for.
They want to, but it is not a priority item.
I am concerned, usually that turns out to be, "Now that we've gotten what we wanted done, we had a look, and it would be faster to remake the game than change it to be multiplayer.". I think that's occurred with 2 games for me now.
Would that be Subnautica? :)
I too could not think of anything more fun that stripping down spaceships together with a friend in a chill co-op session.