安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
I mean, why would you even come to that legend? European leaders know that there is still a struggle in iberia, and that Rurik or his scandinavian friend are not involved in any shape or form. Imagine the king of France, who is fighting his 6th struggle clash because his son married a princess of Leon, hearing that... And even for those who don't know what's going on in Iberia, right now, Rurik is not emperor of Hispania, he is "only" king of Novgorod. How do we explain that he lost the title?
Of course, i don't need the legend to be true of course, that the point of legends. But at least some consistency. I could have accepted the "comes from a prestigious gothic lineage", even for Rurik. But the "worked to turn Empire of hispania into a gothic vision of perfection" part is way too specific to be believable... I would understand if it was linked to gotic heritage, or, why not, a scandinavian who has land in iberia (that would be a nice campaign), but just to tie it with a scandinavian heritage seam a bit weak...