Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
I mean, why would you even come to that legend? European leaders know that there is still a struggle in iberia, and that Rurik or his scandinavian friend are not involved in any shape or form. Imagine the king of France, who is fighting his 6th struggle clash because his son married a princess of Leon, hearing that... And even for those who don't know what's going on in Iberia, right now, Rurik is not emperor of Hispania, he is "only" king of Novgorod. How do we explain that he lost the title?
Of course, i don't need the legend to be true of course, that the point of legends. But at least some consistency. I could have accepted the "comes from a prestigious gothic lineage", even for Rurik. But the "worked to turn Empire of hispania into a gothic vision of perfection" part is way too specific to be believable... I would understand if it was linked to gotic heritage, or, why not, a scandinavian who has land in iberia (that would be a nice campaign), but just to tie it with a scandinavian heritage seam a bit weak...