Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
And on a different note, anyone know if one mayor can hold multiple cities?
I've been thinking to create sort of an economic/development hub in the middle of my territory (because wars are damn expensive when you go feudal), and I'm wondering why I wouldn't take one of the smaller duchies and just turn it Republic. What are the cons I'm not seeing? Seems like the money is better and it's like one fewer duke that will turn against your heir on the next succession.
The downside is fewer levies? But levies are massively expensive, anyway, and I almost don't even bother to raise them--I'd rather pay for mercenaries. What else?
I think i already wrote the math about republican vassals in another thread. Since the lord mayor can hold all the cities and castles in his domain himself, you get direct taxes from all of them. This is already much better than the filtered taxes from feudal vassals (who only get 20% from their mayors).
Base tax is already very high for republicans, and you can invest 3 points into Avarice lifestyle to maximize this (you probably spend 1 point there anyways for Golden Obligations).
You should try to revoke all cities and castles in the area beforehand, so the one mayor can hold as many of them as possible. In theory he could revoke them himself without issues, but i'm not sure if the AI always does that on its own initiative.
I might give it a shot, anyway, and see what happens.
Can you link the math you have done?