Arthur & Mordred

[S]

In this game we play as Sir Mordred. That is, the treacherous knight who managed to kill King Arthur but died at the same time. However, the story of the game begins after both Mordred and Arthur die. He captures Mordred, the Mistress of the mystical Lake Avalon, from the realm of death and brings him back. Because they need someone to kill King Arthur, and only Mordred has been able to do it so far.

Our mission is to kill Arthur again. Because his two-way journey to the realms of death rotted and destroyed all of Arthur's good qualities. What's left of him is poisoning the land of Camelot. The Knights of the Round Table will also assist us in our quest.

As if it was not enough that we were traitors in this game, they also slandered King Arthur, and they launched and vilified King Arthur very badly, I think those who made this game are Sir Mordred's grandchildren.

There is no other explanation for this, but such a good slander against a great king who lived thousands of years ago I gave up on buying this game

[Jack the Roamer]

Clap clap clap clap clap

[Lampros]

WTF?

[Sevrence]

you know king arthur wasn't a real person, right? neither was mordred.

But either way, u said it yourself, 'his two way journey through death... destroyed his good qualities' so this fictional take on a fictional character is explaining why king arthur is now bad.. i think they did a decent job in that regard

sure the story could be more fleshed out but it is what it is.

[Rodi]

Originally posted by Lampros:

WTF?

+1

[Darth_Roxs]

Originally posted by Sevrence:

you know king arthur wasn't a real person, right? neither was mordred.

But either way, u said it yourself, 'his two way journey through death... destroyed his good qualities' so this fictional take on a fictional character is explaining why king arthur is now bad.. i think they did a decent job in that regard

sure the story could be more fleshed out but it is what it is.

This

Originally posted by Lampros:

WTF?

And this

I'll add that I love the fact that they did something different with King Arthur.

[S]

King Arthur is real person.

[jonandbeth]

Originally posted by Daddy Day Care:

Originally posted by Sevrence:

you know king arthur wasn't a real person, right? neither was mordred.

But either way, u said it yourself, 'his two way journey through death... destroyed his good qualities' so this fictional take on a fictional character is explaining why king arthur is now bad.. i think they did a decent job in that regard

sure the story could be more fleshed out but it is what it is.

This

Originally posted by Lampros:

WTF?

And this

I'll add that I love the fact that they did something different with King Arthur.

I totally agree. I love the unique take on Arthur. And you arent forced to be a "bad guy".

[S]

You're having a hard time, after all, you play a man who betrayed Arthur and a man who tried to kill him, and you try to kill Arthur for the 2nd time again.
by the way, arthur is a real character not fictional

[JerBeware]

Yes he may have existed. All the children's stories surrounding him are just that - stories. Mostly fiction, based loosely on someone that historians can neither confirm nor deny existed in the 5th to 6th centuries.