Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
Normas y directrices sobre discusión
Denunciar este mensaje
You can't enjoy Quirky Americana Tropes in a Nuked China. And without that, it isn't really Fallout.
Bethesda has always pretty much stayed away from making references to New Vegas. It's because they didn't make New Vegas, Obsidian did.
So, it's obvious they make their games take place on the other end of the country closer to where their studio is located.
The NCR was being undercut and bled dry by Crimson Caravan, Van Graffs, and House. They're a legion of labor but undisciplined like the real Legion which would have easily broken their moral and taken Vegas had House not intervened.
I think we can consider it to be canon now.
What NV does incredibly well is faction development, and the ability to have differing relationships with all of the factions.
And better.
Im all for East Coast BoS but West Coast BoS were a bunch of scared ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. So maybe there will be a East vs West war since there quite a bit differant idologically but it still seems like a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ dumb idea to straight remove the only faction in the west that wasnt abject evil or small with no power and replace them with a faction that magically muiltiplied in power by a sum of like 100x Something here people are forgetting
What really pulls NV down isn't even its own fault, it is the fault of those who are so preachy - and sometimes toxic, as OP is here - about how "great" NV is in the whole franchise or even go as far that it is the best in the RPG genre. And will have many people agree with them, but 'many' never means everyone. In fact, there is a good number of Fallout fans that despise NV (Me included) because of how obnoxious NV fanboys are; it is what I like to call the "Harry Potter effect," the product itself is fine but its fanbase is what pushes people away because of how preachy they are and how much they refuse to expose themselves to other works..
And to what Iceman PJN said, I too had a much buggier experience in NV than I did with 3, 4, or even 76. In 3, my gamebreaking bug was that I couldn't start a new game which wouldn't CTD the moment my character was born. Thankfully, my saved game works fine. For 4, it wouldn't launch for a good while, but after playing around with the files and pre-launch settings the game works just fine without issue. For 76, I can literally count the number of different bugs I had from launch to now all on one hand: T-posing ghouls and CTDs, both of which disappeared within a few months after launch or after Wastelanders dropped.
NV though? Whoo boy! Likely the most broken game of the FPS games. Yes, unlike 3 I can start a new game just fine, I actually tried doing a new playthrough back in May last year. Key word is "tried." The game CTDs every 15-20 minutes, and there is no way I can prevent it so I need to quicksave almost every 3-5 minutes while looking over my shoulder scared when the next crash may be. At least with 3 I know that it is starting a new game that makes the game CTD so I can just load up an existing save, but in NV both new and saved games are affected. After surprisingly putting up with it for 3hrs, I called it quits and uninstalled NV. Now the only Fallout games on my PC are 4 and 76.
Like I said, NV definitely deserved its praise. And it probably was the best game in the genre at the time. But best Fallout game overall? Hard disagree, and that is by its own flaws alone not its community. Add that factor in and its value sharply drops to become the worst.
And if OP wishes to reply with that stupid argument of, "You didn't claim what Fallout game is the best so my point still stands," then the best game in the series is Fallout 2. It may not be the most popular one. But like Harry Potter, popularity isn't synonymous with being the best.
Have a good day!
https://www.ign.com/articles/the-big-fallout-interview-todd-howard-and-jonathan-nolan-answer-our-burning-questions-about-season-1
The thing you start to realise is that Todd's/Bethesda's input was minimal. The showrunners are the ones that stuffed it up trying to get key emotional beats.
What Bethesda failed at was keeping the showrunners in line.
Its NV, 96% Positive Reviews on Steam, followed by 1 and 2 with 94%, and i allready forgot the other % numbers, but then its 4, 3 and 76, but all games are over 75% so they're all dang good.
Metacritic does not count because littery a Dog could leave a review score and it would count.
Really? That's your final assessment? If we think FONV was the best why are we not all playing that instead of this? I personally have played through FONV to over a Dozen possible ending combinations. I have 100% completion on Achievements in FONV, of the 3 games I can say that about.
When FONV is eventually reborn fully into the FO4 Engine I'll play the hell out of that. Once you completely consume a ting to the point you can quote and speak in detail about every aspect of that story from every side, there's no point going back again. This does not detract from the reality that FONV is the best content of all the FO Franchise content available.
F76, is the only NEW content we will see for the next 10 years. The coming addition for FO4 is just a side quest at best. When FO4 London is complete I'll probably indulge myself to see what they accomplished.