Fallout 1st too expnensive, cheaper is better for you

[Entgegner]

If Fallout 1st would be priced at 5€, you would make a lot more profit.

Simple capitalism 1x1, cheaper things are bought more often, especially in gaming sector.
I could bet my buttcheeks off, that there aren't many people who use Fallout 1st, but if it would be priced at 5€, a LOT multiple more people would use it, which results is more profit for you.

This game is not content overflowing Elder Scrolls Online or World of Warcraft, yet it still is priced even higher then those top dogs. ESO ensures thousands of hours of unique gameplay, for only 12€, while you've seen everything twice in Fallout 76 at around 100h.

Change that greedy mess to something which grands you more profit, it's a win/win situation for everyone, you (Bethesda/Microsoft) and the customers.

[Seithan]

I agree, but Bugthesda is using a sound cancellation algorithm, them logical suggestions never reach their ears.

[Wade]

I think the problem is not the price of F1st subscription. The problem is that for all that money I'm paying, there is no quality DLC or new content.

The Pitt/ Expeditions system is bad. When compared to The Elder Scrolls Online, DLCs for F76 are of very poor quality. They are some minor, lame contents that nobody like or care about.

Look at all these updates and DLCs for ESO: https://www.elderscrollsonline.com/en-us/updates

F76 gets very little love from Bethesda.

[[V7]SASKIA-3D]

If you play focused - you don't need 1st - 1st is made for hoarders

[DtHouse]

SuperSaskia.V7님이 먼저 게시:

If you play focused - you don't need 1st - 1st is made for hoarders

and lazy player like me xD

[m142]

if they didn't focus so much on politics and trends and started to upgrade game in a faster peace it would have a lott more f1st for sure.
but they tend to do stupid ♥♥♥♥ , unnecesary stuff to show that they'r good company and screw people using thier product , so no they might get more people for now just because they deleted explosive on energy weapons but it's for 3-6 months , after that they'll manage to screw somehow to lose that income.

[therussmeister]

Wade Rocketowsky님이 먼저 게시:

I
Look at all these updates and DLCs for ESO: https://www.elderscrollsonline.com/en-us/updates

F76 gets very little love from Bethesda.

ESO has way more players than 76, kinda makes sense. Of course that's self-reinforcing too, people don't play cuz there's no content, content isn't developed cuz no one plays.....

[BizarreMan]

SuperSaskia.V7님이 먼저 게시:

If you play focused - you don't need 1st - 1st is made for hoarders

I resemble that remark.

[Angela]

Seithan님이 먼저 게시:

I agree, but Bugthesda is using a sound cancellation algorithm, them logical suggestions never reach their ears.

It's why they like reddit so much, the wall of stupidity there automatically does the sensible idea cancellation work for them.

[Angela]

Oh, and discord, where anything useful gets immediately drowned out by memes.

[BizarreMan]

Angela님이 먼저 게시:

Oh, and discord, where anything useful gets immediately drowned out by memes.

Let me show you cat and pizza gifs!

[Angela]

BizarreMan님이 먼저 게시:

Angela님이 먼저 게시:

Oh, and discord, where anything useful gets immediately drowned out by memes.

Let me show you cat and pizza gifs!

LOOK - SQUIRREL!

[76561199281265327]

you can actually play this game without even having 1st , just figure it out already, many of use play free of the burden of monthly subscriptions

[Rootiga]

I actually would buy fallout 1st again if it were only $5 a month im not buying it again at the current price

[Lazarus]

therussmeister님이 먼저 게시:

Wade Rocketowsky님이 먼저 게시:

I
Look at all these updates and DLCs for ESO: https://www.elderscrollsonline.com/en-us/updates

F76 gets very little love from Bethesda.

ESO has way more players than 76, kinda makes sense. Of course that's self-reinforcing too, people don't play cuz there's no content, content isn't developed cuz no one plays.....

I hate the ESO subscription, and see absolutely no valid use in it except for the crowns. Prefer to use tamriel crown exchange to buy all my crown store items there.
It seems like 80% of the player base is all for buying it too~
But coming over here to the 76 community, it seems like only 10% is paying for fallout 1st~ But yet they both offer the same dumb unlimited stash.
Kinda mind blowing considering that I'll farm millions of gold for the next DLC + be kinda disappointed by it.
While 76 is going the no paid DLC route + everyone hates the fact of supporting the game any farther.
I love both games equally, but the whales just aren't into this game for some reason.

[Entgegner]

Wade Rocketowsky님이 먼저 게시:

I think the problem is not the price of F1st subscription. The problem is that for all that money I'm paying, there is no quality DLC or new content.

The Pitt/ Expeditions system is bad. When compared to The Elder Scrolls Online, DLCs for F76 are of very poor quality. They are some minor, lame contents that nobody like or care about.

Look at all these updates and DLCs for ESO: https://www.elderscrollsonline.com/en-us/updates

F76 gets very little love from Bethesda.

yea, eso is superior in that case. I don't think there is any other mmo, which grands this absolute mass of content for only 13€.