Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Aluminum is still vulnerable to storm damage. It used to be the lightest material but they changed wood\stone and I'm not sure if that's true anymore.
Sorry, that's not 100% true. In some of the extreme storm areas on the Styx map, concrete can take damage. Styx has the most extreme weather events of any of the maps.
Interesting, i've done about 100 hours open world on the styx map on hard and built in all biomes in concrete with hardened glass walls protected by concrete over hangs, and so far at least, even on red storms i haven't had any damage. From what you're saying though it could happen. I assume the red storm is the most severe? Or, are there areas that have more severe storms than others?
i do believe that concrete building do not take damage from storms i have tested it out and all the storms no damage with using concrete building it just alot of grind for them
Wind damage is the chip damage your building takes periodically during a storm. Concrete has no wind damage resistance listed in the stats because it takes zero wind damage while all the other pieces typically have it listed.
A tier 6 storm can over match a tier 6 building piece though. So Stone, Clay, Scoria, Socria Brick, Reinforced Wood, and Reinforced Glass can all take wind damage during a tier 6 storm.
Now snow build-up can collapse a flat roofed building piece without enough support whether it's concrete or not. Snow build up reduces it's structural integrity so you see the piece get progressively larger cracks as the snow accumulates until it wobbles and collapses just like when trying to build further and further from support. This is not technically storm damage though.
This is very helpful, thanks! The snow build up on flat roofed buildings is an interesting one. I have a number of 8x8 concrete buildings with flat concrete roofs built in arctic regions. I use the flat roofs to place my wind turbines. They do get a lot of snow at times. Also supporting the 8x8 concrete tiles is just one central concrete pole (other than the poles on the walls). So far so good, but i'm wondering if this may break at some point?
Personally I wouldn't trust a flat 8x8 but I guess technically it seems feasible with vertical beams. I think the limit for concrete is one away from support, so if you have supported vertical beams in the outer wall directly touching the roof pieces and one in the middle then all of the pieces are only one away from a support. Being higher off the ground would lower this I think as structural integrity drops as you go higher.
My experience on the 'way to go idiot' scale was with a concrete 3x3. Four foundations in the corners, single high walls all around and nine flat roof pieces while I sat and waited through a storm while the drills were pulling up exotics. The center roof piece collapsed on me from the snow right onto my fire. Much cold was had. It wasn't even a 4+ storm just lots of snow. The broken piece was two away from a direct support as I had no vertical beams in the wall. The other roof pieces didn't break as they were only one away from support.