ติดตั้ง Steam
เข้าสู่ระบบ
|
ภาษา
简体中文 (จีนตัวย่อ)
繁體中文 (จีนตัวเต็ม)
日本語 (ญี่ปุ่น)
한국어 (เกาหลี)
български (บัลแกเรีย)
Čeština (เช็ก)
Dansk (เดนมาร์ก)
Deutsch (เยอรมัน)
English (อังกฤษ)
Español - España (สเปน)
Español - Latinoamérica (สเปน - ลาตินอเมริกา)
Ελληνικά (กรีก)
Français (ฝรั่งเศส)
Italiano (อิตาลี)
Bahasa Indonesia (อินโดนีเซีย)
Magyar (ฮังการี)
Nederlands (ดัตช์)
Norsk (นอร์เวย์)
Polski (โปแลนด์)
Português (โปรตุเกส - โปรตุเกส)
Português - Brasil (โปรตุเกส - บราซิล)
Română (โรมาเนีย)
Русский (รัสเซีย)
Suomi (ฟินแลนด์)
Svenska (สวีเดน)
Türkçe (ตุรกี)
Tiếng Việt (เวียดนาม)
Українська (ยูเครน)
รายงานปัญหาเกี่ยวกับการแปลภาษา
Subject to change is one thing, but gutting contents and outright not delivering on promises is another.
Their poor communication only compounds this, they can do a lot better in that regard.
You want to throw in with a guy who virtue signals his way out of getting 200 hours of entertainment for $50 and still feels cheated?
You are the company you keep.
I’m just frustrated with how things turned out, like how they changed good maps, cut out promised content, and didn't follow through on what they said. It’s not just about the hours or the money, it’s the lack of respect for what they promised.
How does that diminish from the fact that content was cut, promises were not fulfilled, and other such own goals at the hands of the developers?
You'd rather attack the character of someone else than address the content of their post or even admit that RoN has a lot of potential and can absolutely be a better product?
Feel free to, but tribalism isn't my vice.
I commented on the information they provided, which was both relevant and illuminating about their attitude toward the product from which they have received 200 hours of engagement, likely fun - or they are also masochistic - for a relatively low price in comparison to other forms of entertainment.
The claim was that the 200 hours was in some sort of hopeful service or devotion to the future of the game; a sacrifice and not enjoyment, hence the virtue signal observation; it is a textbook example.
They've received their cake and now wish to eat it.
This is the type who feel empowered to join in this thread, to whose star you hitched your wagon, thus by extension...
I have admitted that the game is not perfect but have additionally claimed that with mods, it has been made good for me. I speak for my experience as you speak for yours. Can RoN be better? Of course, but what can't, including you and I? I tend to avoid comparative thinking in matters like these, as it is a disservice to everyone involved, myself included.
Wishing the studio bankruptcy and closure is absurd within this context. Hyperbolic and childish. I don't doubt that everyone vehemently complaining in this thread ("literally unplayable"? Please) is much like the individual I quoted, with high numbers of on the whole enjoyable hours in the game, so as with my comments about guilt by association, you can do the remaining math.
Yeah relying on mods in RoN = Good
Relying on mods in bethesda's games = bad, and devs are lazy
You've mischaracterized cherry-picked sections of my writing. I'm less planting a flag than burning yours. I need not defend RoN to oppose your views.
I didn't say that a "reliance" on mods was "good", nor did I comment on any other games.
Many of the views expressed in this thread are so unhinged, entitled and discourteous, they're simply providing the staff at VOID some humor while they eat lunch. Admirable passion, but using a fire hose to fight a campfire.
Also, who actually proudly displays their association with /v/? What was it you said about the company you keep? And you're giving people here crap for their, admittedly childish, hope that Void shutters when that's basically all /v/ does?
Wew, lad.
Bad faith? You'll have to expand on that as well as my allegiance to "/v/", whatever that may be. I may be naive because I really don't know.
I'm sure I would be wrong to assume you mean Void, but let me explain my bad acting.
Not attacking doesn't mean there is no fight. I simply choose to trust that things will improve and feel that diplomacy is the better option. As such, I'm grateful to and silent within the threads pointing out problems in a reasonable manner, respectfully. There are problems with the game and Void need to know about them, but they are people, just like you or I. It matters. As such, my defense is not of the game, per se and my attack not of the shortcomings therein.
Now, if that makes me a bad faith actor to you, then yes, I am. I've seen what a supportive community can do (The Long Dark community is a perfect example), how it inspires developers and motivates everyone toward improvement. Inciting outrage and disgust to the point of wishing the developers to go bankrupt is destructive, not constructive and only a detriment to everything and everyone involved. Civility and care in communication fosters growth; developers are happier to sit at their computers longer and work through problems and we get heard and our ideas attended. It just makes sense.
Social media brings out the animals and Steam is no different. X, Reddit...it's all the same gathering of irresponsible, anonymous people spouting hyperbolic and paranoid nonsense. If being a bad actor to you means calling them out and taking them to task, then I'm the worst. We should all be so bad.
Hello no. Adams update was garbage, At least if that was the 2022 winter update. Everyone was screaming all 2023 how the game crap during that entire time. RON was at its peak after the summer 2022 update. Suspects actually surrendered, team AI wasn't as brain dead, firefights were more lethal, graphics were better. That was the best version of RON ever.