Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Are you 100% sure that the game will be back on the store once infringing material is removed?
But soon, In about a week I'd say.
Now, it's a trademark issue? You guys could have been more upfront about it. Not to mention, you guys didn't exactly do a good job of addressing the external controversy surrounding the June 12th release of the nightclub map.
I'm happy it's going to be resolved, but frankly there were better ways to handle all this. I just hope the game stays up.
An official ETA would be sweet, but that is a fair explanation
I just wanna try the mp9 already
Yeah haha, I'm keen to test the new whitebox maps and the finished club map aswell as all of the AI changes.
But yeah generally it's 1 to 2 weeks following the supporter edition patches us regular players get the update, issues in the supporter patches get passed onto the devs for them to fix ready for it going into what I would consider to be the "stable build"
Sometimes it can be longer, sometimes shorter, it all depends how many issues are uncovered and how easy they are to be fixed.
Thats my understanding of the process anyway.
Lets see a copyright strike on that.
Confirming that it was trademark issue pretty much confirms that it was nothing about the release of the nightclub map release though... Also, the nightclub map was released months ago, and went through multiple visual updates within those past months. The normal update of an already existing map was probably coincidental. The map is going to get even more updates after this as well.
I just think it would have been better handled/generated less controversy if the devs were upfront about the trademark issue from the start. I don't know why they mentioned they were investigating a Steam backend problem.
Also, again, while the map itself clearly wasn't the problem, they didn't address the coinciding dates. Cause a lot of publications took issue with that and have been spreading misinformation about the game.