Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But generally speaking, you can AT MOST kill ONE suspect on most maps and still get S, anything more than that and you won't get it
2910 points on 23 megabytes a second is A+
While 2915 points is S
sounds like you personally experienced it
Got screengrabs of both runs
The map layout varies with replay. The score can't be compare. Depend if you have 10 or 11 suspects on the map. There is never the same number of civilians and suspects.
To get S, you really need to take everyone alive.
Fortunately the game's AI is programmed in such a way to accommodate this tight scoring system. You will be very inclined to keep everyone alive with, on average, ten thousand bullets whizzing past your ear the moment you peak a corner.
Screengrabs prove you wrong
As I had the exact same number of civilians and Suspects on both runs
9 suspects, 5 Civilians
And how is this a good system? Stimulate you to explore map? Even exploring don't help, and people just will google it.
It shouldn't be like that, you literally ideally completed mission, but didn't find 4 evidence - the end, not even A+ to you.
And I have zero problems with non lethal, it should be like that if you want top score. But EVEN with this, you still can't do this. Need rebalance.