Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Your placing your efforts in the wrong places. Wasted time focusing on the wrong things. Kislev didn't need a rework. Rampage didnt need a rework. Sieges are something that all factions do from empire to ogres. We need the core issues fixed. Sieges. slow motion not working in multiplayer. Gates functioning properly. actual battle AI. disgusting bloom and blurry issues on peoples hardware. and many more issues. These are all huge issues that need fixing more than ironing out the kinks on one faction only. Considering the highs of TW:WH2, TW:H3 has been a complete disaster and wasted effort
Honestly. If anything needs doing Sieges need to be pulled out and just done again from the start. they are a huge part of the game which all factions do. and they are so boring and repetitive and so many of the ugly issues with this game show their head in these battles.
In this case its a necessity to let the players take part in the development cycle.
Its not about doing whats best. There is no objective truth in that regard. Its about what resonates best with the players. How do you make sure you do what resonates best with the players? By involving the players in the process.