安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
And to be fair, what CIG does would not a single AAA publisher ever would even consider to try. Why? Because a too risky project. And that is the reason why so many believe in SC, because it is the only chance that we will ever get such a big space sim on such a scale without scratching only on the possibilities.
Space Engineers is only a tiny cheap game compared to SQ42/SC. But as always, size alone didn't mean anything about fun. I had a lot of fun with SE1 and I also will have a lot of fun with SQ42.
I Just asked where they saw a published timeframe for the "slices".
Why do you always play the "drama queen?"
Wasn't even talking to you.
i guess i bought it too soon ... oh well its saved
SE2 is a little apartment house while SC is a skyscraper.
That's what they said about SE1
NO.
This is like buying a game without using a brain.
This is like buying a game without understanding EA and Eula.
"I'm Klaus".
You know bro, If your a real Dev,
you wouldn't be here yammering non sense with the common rabble who are illiterate to understand EA and EULA since you understand it in the first place.
Now you and your dad look like a BS to me.