To make this remaster really spectacular, Square consider this

[Blackened Halo]

- Field scenes at 60 fps (I do not know if it is possible)
- Fixing Z-buffering and geometry (this is possible as the Duckstation emu supports it)
- add a nice scanline effect (check the Duckstation settings)

[blahblahblacksheep8]

Emulating a game isn't a remaster.
It's faking the original hardware in software 20 years later.

[Dzaka]

called it.... i effing called it... they fix what y'all complain about originally and all you can do is more complaining.. this is why blackened halo is just a little troll

[Chouchers]

Will they give you what ask in to patch still not perfect the performance massive boost but not 100% there some jitters and speedups in battle but feels way better then before.

[Dzaka]

Originally posted by Chouchers:

Will they give you what ask in to patch still not perfect the performance massive boost but not 100% there some jitters and speedups in battle but feels way better then before.

you can have a bleeding edge computer. and get momentary jitter and skips on any game.. it's not always the game's fault.. in fact it usually isn't.. it's possibly something in your computer. some program causing the issues

edit: in fact it could be caused by your computer parking unused cpu cores.

[Blackened Halo]

Originally posted by Dzaka:

called it.... i effing called it... they fix what y'all complain about originally and all you can do is more complaining.. this is why blackened halo is just a little troll

well I am complaining because otherwise Square would have thought they had done everything they could have

[Dzaka]

Originally posted by Blackened Halo:

Originally posted by Dzaka:

called it.... i effing called it... they fix what y'all complain about originally and all you can do is more complaining.. this is why blackened halo is just a little troll

well I am complaining because otherwise Square would have thought they had done everything they could have

they didn't need to do anything. there wasn't a problem other than entitled idiots who always complain. no matter what

"the game doesn't do what I THINK IT SHOULD!!! there's a problem.... FIX IT!!!!"

[Aether]

I'd love 60FPS on the field too, which is (was?) possible previously with Special K, but did sometimes cause softlocks in certain scenes. You had to toggle fast-forward to unstick them.

What this means is that they would have to review the game for any parts where increased FPS breaks the game and update it. (Which you know, would be the right idea, I'm just not holding my breath.)

[blahblahblacksheep8]

Originally posted by Dzaka:

Originally posted by Blackened Halo:

well I am complaining because otherwise Square would have thought they had done everything they could have

they didn't need to do anything. there wasn't a problem other than entitled idiots who always complain. no matter what

"the game doesn't do what I THINK IT SHOULD!!! there's a problem.... FIX IT!!!!"

Why shouldn't the game do what we think it should do? Zbuffer and geometry fixes are quite important to fix with ps1 games. Some stuff was fixed. Great. But other things were also of great importance that isn't. Warped backgrounds, zbuffer, geometry are also of utmost importance for this game. It has emulation problems historically found in other emulators.
Stop putting people in prison over roms that use emulators, then make "legal emulators" that are half assed coded... FFIX wasn't an emulation and we see how great that turned out.. It was so great there's an animated series in production supposedly and a remake game. Because of the great quality remaster job of FFIX. Chrono Cross got thrown under the bus and ran over and left to die compared to the job Silicon studios did with FFIX remaster.

[NamelessNP]

Originally posted by Dzaka:

called it.... i effing called it... they fix what y'all complain about originally and all you can do is more complaining.. this is why blackened halo is just a little troll

60 fps in battle but 30 fps outside battle isn't really fixing the problem, it's only half fixed.

[Dzaka]

Originally posted by NamelessNP:

Originally posted by Dzaka:

called it.... i effing called it... they fix what y'all complain about originally and all you can do is more complaining.. this is why blackened halo is just a little troll

60 fps in battle but 30 fps outside battle isn't really fixing the problem, it's only half fixed.

why do you need 60fps at all? iit's not a fighting game.. you don't need pixel perfect dodges or reactions. the battle system doesn't even have a system like the mario rpg's.. or shadow hearts which have battle systems in the turn based rpg genre that involves needing good stable framerates

the game literally doesn't need it.. so why do you?

[NamelessNP]

Originally posted by Dzaka:

Originally posted by NamelessNP:

60 fps in battle but 30 fps outside battle isn't really fixing the problem, it's only half fixed.

why do you need 60fps at all? iit's not a fighting game.. you don't need pixel perfect dodges or reactions. the battle system doesn't even have a system like the mario rpg's.. or shadow hearts which have battle systems in the turn based rpg genre that involves needing good stable framerates

the game literally doesn't need it.. so why do you?

Man it's crazy how some people will blindly defend lazy ports and subpar post-release support.

[Dzaka]

Originally posted by NamelessNP:

Originally posted by Dzaka:

why do you need 60fps at all? iit's not a fighting game.. you don't need pixel perfect dodges or reactions. the battle system doesn't even have a system like the mario rpg's.. or shadow hearts which have battle systems in the turn based rpg genre that involves needing good stable framerates

the game literally doesn't need it.. so why do you?

Man it's crazy how some people will blindly defend lazy ports and subpar post-release support.

again why do you NEED it.... you WANT it.. but you don't NEED it.

[NamelessNP]

Originally posted by Dzaka:

Originally posted by NamelessNP:

Man it's crazy how some people will blindly defend lazy ports and subpar post-release support.

again why do you NEED it.... you WANT it.. but you don't NEED it.

Who said anything about "need?"
If you're going down that road you don't "need" a pc version at all, you can just play the original. This is supposed to be a remaster though, which comes with expectations for modern standards.

[Dzaka]

Originally posted by NamelessNP:

Originally posted by Dzaka:

again why do you NEED it.... you WANT it.. but you don't NEED it.

Who said anything about "need?"
If you're going down that road you don't "need" a pc version at all, you can just play the original. This is supposed to be a remaster though, which comes with expectations for modern standards.

if that were true than ff1-6 havn't been remastered either

what you want is a remake.. a remaster is the same. just with upgraded visuals.. and it could easily be just 5 pixels in serge's bandana changed

[NamelessNP]

Originally posted by Dzaka:

Originally posted by NamelessNP:

Who said anything about "need?"
If you're going down that road you don't "need" a pc version at all, you can just play the original. This is supposed to be a remaster though, which comes with expectations for modern standards.

if that were true than ff1-6 havn't been remastered either

what you want is a remake.. a remaster is the same. just with upgraded visuals.. and it could easily be just 5 pixels in serge's bandana changed

Framerate is literally part of the visuals, not sure what you're talking about.