Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Let's say they were both adopted around the age of 2, and that they adopted Elizabeth in 2003, when it was legalised. That would mean the MC and Cove are born in 2003.
If they're born in 2003, at 8 years old they're in the year 2011. 13 is the year 2016 and 18 is the year 2021.
Now this is fairly consistent actually, at 18 they do have smartphones which means they're probably in somewhat recent times. Although perhaps they were actually born in 2002 and the adoptions were when they were a little older.
So yeah based on the legalisation of same-sex adoption I guess that the steps take place in 2011, then 2016, then 2021. Those aren't exact but pretty close.
Of course I'm not sure if it's a possibility that in actuality Noelani and Pamela didn't adopt the MC and Elizabeth as a couple initially, and actually only one of them was a legal parent of each child until the laws caught up and both could be legal parents. If that's the case it could take place earlier.
Anyway yeah I know I asked a question but I ended up speculating and coming up with a possible answer for myself hahaha. I'm interested in hearing other perspectives though.
Because from step 2 to step 3 there's an inbetween that says due to changing laws and public perception our mums can now wear their wedding rings in public.
This makes me think that the year 2013 (the year same-sex marriage was legalised in california) lies between Step 2 and Step 3, and it introduces the possibility that in fact they were born much earlier than 2003. But it doesn't mention actually getting married so maybe it's more about public perception than changing laws. And this would assume that the mums adopted before the year 2003.
Or maybe this is talking about 2015 where it was legalised nationwide. In that case maybe my year marks are only a couple years off, and they did adopt after the legalisation in 2003.
Maybe cove and mc were born in 2001, and noelani and pamela adopted elizabeth at 4 (she was born in 1999). Step 1 takes place in 2009, step 2 in 2014 and step 3 in 2019. This is probably the earliest you could go assuming the kids were adopted after the 2003 legalisation.
So basically the earliest Step 1 can probably be is 2009 I think. The latest it could be is probably around 2012 I wouldn't go much further than that tbh.
I'm analysing this way too hard lmao
Step 1: 2006
Step 2: 2011
Step 3: 2016
Step 4: 2021
And Cove was born in 1997, since he's about to turn 9 in 2006.
A part of the story doesn't come across exactly in-game, but Noelani says "I" adopted Lizzie from the Philippines rather than "we" adopted her. Though Lani was with Pamela, they weren't a legal couple at the the time and didn't adopt as a couple. Noelani used a fictional adoption group that worked with her as a "single" woman. Later in life everything was sorted and both ladies became legal adoptive parents. It was just kind of awkward to have her explain those extra steps when ultimately it was only a detour that didn't change the conclusion and a more urgent topic was at hand. However, that's how the adoption worked out in terms of legality at the time. I'm sorry for the confusion.
No, they're 18 in Step 3. Cove and MC are 8 in 2006 so they're 18 in 2016.
Oh thank you very much! That's really helpful. You don't have to apologise, I had fun theorising and thinking of different possibilities.
I thought that maybe one of them could have adopted as a single mother to step around the law which is why I wasn't sure about the 2011 theory. I'm glad to have an answer!
edit: step around the law is the wrong word. it was possible for LGBT couples to end up looking after adopted children perfectly legally, it just wasn't possible to joint adopt, they'd have to adopt as a single parent.
So the timeline was definitely well thought out.