Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Strategy is in a very difficult place right now as a genre in total. Expectations are high, while the budget on them seems to shrink. Triple A Publishers do not dare to touch this genre anymore.
And this game was basically outdated (in terms of graphics and mechanics) when it was released.
I grew up on these games. But with me, so did many others. And you can’t sell the same thing over and over again without a good twist / spin on it. These days I am looking for to games like Broken Arrow which actually push into new directions both in terms of graphics and in game mechanics.
Best automatic PvP auto matchmaking since 2007 World in Conflict.
3-2-1-Game :)
See you all sometime on the battlefield
Have fun !
Because snowflakes who wanted this to be a PvE game only.
52% is an abysmal rating for a game that costs 45 eur, so OP's question is totally legit and some of you do a disservice to the game you are defending with such blind, 1-sided answers.
For someone interested in this kind of strategy games that wants to know sincere opinions about how's the game, this kind of attitude sincerely puts off. Even more for those interested in the pve part of the game, knowing that the game is always-online and a part of it seems to be playing against the sames that answer that way. No, thanks.
Finally, @ibuprofen answer is at least useful. Thank you from a potential buyer and i totally agree with you in that the actual situation for strategy games is a very difficult one.
They wouldn't be in trouble if you weren't so damn gullible.
Oh, do you think i am? I also think you are, as we know each other so well, right? :P
Don't think anyone would care about getting to know you. I say that based on the fact you are nodding your head and paying attention to someone who doesn't even own the game.
At 30% it ends in game over comedy and only when a game gets to 80% score... then most people smooth out in happiness :)
In 3 months people will calm down, regardless of score.
Second: Well, people can't wait. They want all here and now. Despite the fact that game is playable right now anyway. No reasons to refund, I mean, just look at me. I have 400+ hrs in MOWAS, I played Gates of Hell, I played MOWAS, and I am very big fan of strategies, and I still found this game pretty interesting.
Just have a little patience. This game is already better 100x times even in performance compared to Gays of Hell. People will soon switch to this game.
If you want - there's no reasons to not buy it. Current state of the game is pretty normal for a fresh release, there's many units and content even on that stage of the game. Also a PVE mode if you'll get bored in PVP.