Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
And DevolaPopola actually produced new bodies every time, and replicants are sterile (though they aware of concept of sexuality just... I don't know, copying human behavior?) Then why not just making other clones that'd be total soulless vessels for their gestalts, moreover - why do they need "extract genetic information from gestalts to make replicants, then return replicant's information back to gestalts"? Couldn't they get it one time to reproduce clones based on it so prevent getting "bugged" genes from the relapsed gestalts (which is Yona's unique case btw)? Don't know, still the game world looks like replicants are scarce and dying out, and shades are spawning all around, though the conflict could look more naturally in opposite. Well, at least let's pretend that those shades in The Aerie and that mask girl were sentient gestalts that relapsed as we see it - becoming "shady" things. If it so, well ok, though it's another example of poor representation. And I wouldn't think Kalil or that "mother" shade inthe Castle were NOT sentient, though...
And the ending and consequences. There was something about other regions where Popodevolas have managed to convince replicants to accept their gestalts before game events. Which breaks the whole thing again. Have they merge without grimoires? And, since they're complete reproductive (oops, speculation) humans, the humanity could survive right up to alien invasion, which appears only 7 years since the game, in Automata. Though the guide itself notes that without Shadowlord the humanity is doomed to extinction. And the ending E - that, in some manner, paid the game off for me after those useless 4 runs of the previous - is not a canonical one.
Man, if you think I write a lot, I know a guy who had made 5 hours of video about The Evil Within flaws and stupidities, and The Evil Within looked more harmonious and complete...
Overall, all of the points you've made are somewhat valid, provided you know the lore(which I don't), and I'm still working my way through the endings C to E.
However, one thing you've got wrong, is that the original game was released BEFORE Automata. Automata had to work with whatever Nier:Gestalt(EU/NA) &| Nier:Replicant(JP) had left a decade-ish ago.
Yep, been watching him lol ...Probably so did Game Kitchen, 'cause after that Blasphemous review, they've fixed exactly those things Zulin was complaining about, curiously...
I've put it correctly (did I?): Automata followed Replicant 7 years after...
Don't know, I was just trying to figure out things operating with some official information. Also kinda expecting that some mega Taro-logist will poke my nose into the parts claryfying these confusions... But if you google those flaws, like about "Devola & Popola guarding Castle" situation, you'd find only "I believe it's because" this , "Probably it means" that, "But I played it 50 years ago so not sure" etc., which is frustranting because I had no lesser faith in this game than those fans. But I cannot tell the director's plot composition from unfinished gaping script, so I gave my faith up, sadly. Very-very sadly, it's not that Silent Hill kind of story - where everything is on purpose, has some meaning and all that.
Ah, I missed the 7 years part in your UPD/response.
The original post paints it as if "Automata is superior, but came out earlier than Replicant". It's just me messing it up, not you.
As for why Automata's story feels more "complete" inclusive and conclusive, here are my thoughts: Automata had the benefit of coming out years later and I assume that means Yoko Taro had more time to figure out what he wanted this weird-ass universe to be, there were lots of materials that came out after the release of Gestalt/Replicant that filled in gaps that didn't make it into the game (the entire Little Mermaid sidequest in Seafront was not in the original game, for example, and was instead a short story)
Automata also had the benefit of being a game developed by Platinum Games, which made for a tighter experience and scope as an action game.
By comparison, the original Nier Gestalt/Replicant from 2010 was developed by Cavia, and to be completely honest, Cavia's games were kinda cramp - pretty much every game Yoko Taro worked on before Automata was.... not great in terms of gameplay. Playing the original Drakengard today is not far off from psychological torture. The original Nier was clunky and grindy and half baked in terms of mechanics and the world of that game is incredible small for budget reasons. I loved that game but it sure was a bad time occasionally, I was only in it for the plot.
Yoko Taro isn't trying to pull a JRR Tolkien thing here, he's not attempting to build a fictional world with realistic history and real language and iron-clad logic like the Lord of the Rings universe. I kinda get the feeling, after following his work for over a decade, that this guy writes his stories for taking loose threads of his universe and having fun with it, and writing for emotional masochists with silly plot like "wouldnt it be ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up if you realized that your enemy were actually innocent beings trying to get by?" "what if your entire purpose for revenge was pointless?" "what if this android with a sexy ass who is your coworker was secretly sent specifically to kill you if you got too close to the truth?". I think it takes a kind of madness to be into this guy's works, you kinda gotta be a freak to fall down the rabbit hole and accept that in some cases you might not get the answer for years and when you do it'll be a single line in a short story or a slideshow from a live concert or stage play or gacha game that's about to get shut down.
Btw, Automata has plenty of "lore/plot holes" the side of Replicant's, but they're less glaring and fit in better with the much-expanded (or were already explained by prior material). For example, why is there a german-style medieval castle in the middle of the ruins of post-apocalyptic japan that was implied to be dedicated to the cult from Drakengard? (no clue!) What the ♥♥♥♥ is the kingdom of night mentioned in both games? (we kinda have an answer to this one!)
In short, I think Yoko Taro is just havin' fun with it so expecting clear answers might be like tilting at windmills. Anyhow, what do you wanna know?
Totally ok with it, the problem is - the concepts don't work with themselves, they contradict and cancel each other.
So, why Devola and Popola have been searching Shadowlord for five years (coming from their dialogue about "finally locate the Shadowlord") if they knew about his "castle" and had an access to it (coming from the fact, they came there before Nier)?
Why did they try to drive off Nier at first, then "approve" him for entering?
Why do they need to "retrieve the data" from the deceased Replicants to their Gestalts every time, and why do they use the corrupt data of slowly relapsing Gestalt to produce Replicant instead of using the original... idk, "data sample"? Coming from the fact, that only the Replicants produced with corrupted data have Black Scrawl, except Yonah who was corrupted originally.
Why hadn't Gestalt Nier "grown up" in 1400 years - ok, PROBABLY other child/teenage Gestalts were in sleep mode until recently. And like what, had he really been waiting all this damn time and then gone all over a rebellion?))
Why couldn't Emil petrify the shade's head, the Shadowlord, the anything instead of waiting the library fight's outcome? Ok, it's more about holes in the plot, not in concepts, but...
Am I right seeing the Aerie & the desert girl situations as sentient Gestalts - therefore of human appearance? If so, then why do they start relapsing like from nothing? If not, then wtf are they at all?
And if there were places where Popodevola could persuade Replicants to accept their Gestalts - as the guidebook states - then why had humanity extinct nevertheless?
And yes: "I believe it's...", "I think it's...", "probably..." - are not answers.
- I thought this was clear already, but they tried to drive him off because they don't want to fight him.
- They don't retrieve the data of deceased Replicants, they are just dead and are not used for anything. New Replicants are born from their Gestalts DNA. Neither "only Replicants produced with corrupted data have Black Scrawl." Relapsed Gestalt = Black Scrawled Replicant. That means that it doesn't matters if a Gestalt relapsed when their Replicant was already there, they don't magically avoids getting Black Scrawl.
I don't really understand what you tried to say, they are actually using their original data sample, but it's corrupted and the Gestalts are relapsed, there's not any kind of backup or something, you may notice that Project Gestalt was such a messy things that it wasn't really well designed overall, and that is due to what mankind was fighting: Both WCS and Legion War.
- Gestalts doesn't grown up. This is a small detailed explained in the 12020 Orquesta, but this Gestalt specifically was taking the "physical appaerance" of his Replicant because they were "sharing" the same dreams, and that's how he knew what his Replicant was experiencing. And he didn't revealed out of nowhere, he waited 1.400 years because they promised Yonah would be cured when the Project Gestalts succesfully ends; but when the whole Relapsing thing was getting out of control, he knew he had to act, because he was getting more and more out of time.
- Take in mind that even if Emil could petrify a lot of them, he would still be killed because there were just so many of them, that's why instead he went all the way to Nier's village to warn out everyone.
- Succesfully merging with a Replicant body doesn't makes you invulnerable to relapsing, that's why the last resort was using the White and Black Grimoires forced fusion code.
- Because when the Original Gestalt, Nier, died, he stopped providing his maso that made him (and all of them) more unlikely to get relapsed. Because of this, every Gestalt, sooner or later was going to relapse, driving mankind to extinction, even when some Devola and Popola completed their task.
Thank you for your insight, I got a few more questions for you if you don't mind me asking:
1)Did it ever get explained anywhere what exactly happens when a non-relapsed replicant dies? Would be a little weird if Jeffrey dies and just suddenly comes back to the village the next day.
2)Ending E spoilers!
Do Kainé and Nier get to life happily ever after at the end at least? Or is the black scrawl gonna get them too? No idea what Ending E implies..
Bonus question that is probably impossible to answer: Shouldn't replicants be very aware of what they are? Considering they were probably "born" in artifical wombs or something?