Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So look.. i've gotten past the fact that the game caps out at 30fps and uncapping to 60 makes some missions broken (resulting in you getting suck in the game). But my main issue is the game fails to keep a steady 30. On the lowest possible settings, my laptop can stick around 30 for the most part and then randomly dip to 19. Like wtf?! I really dont mind having to play at 30, but provided its a solid 30..
Im running this on a Lenovo Y50 - 4th gen Core i7 4700HQ 2.4ghz quadcore... 16gigs of 1600mhz ram, and a GTX 860m with 4GB dedicated video memory. All this says to me is "Wow rockstar.. You're code optimization was terrible in GTA IV, and you've gone and ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up again with LA Noire. The game is not at all enjoyable at all like this"
If anyone- ANYONE could please link me to some performance fixes, 3rd party patches, commandline stuff.. Anything... I'll give you a cookie. Please help! :(
I got this game on sale for $5 instead of wiping the dust off my 360 and purchasing it for $20. I enjoy my laptop more and it should be 100% capable of playing this game..
i've messaged steam for a refund before on Aliens: Colonial Marines for various reasons, and basically they got back to me and said the only way they do refunds is if you pre-order and the game has yet to be released, as in even once its out its too late. there may be some rare circumstances they would refund you but basically id say your s*** outta luck. gotta be careful what u buy, sometimes it pays to check reviews first.
Sorry to hear you're having issues mate, but I do have to clear up one thing. Running Skyrim maximum doesn't really prove a systems capabilities because the engine is just a heavily modified Gamebryo engine, same engine used in Fallout3/Newvegas/, its now called the "Creation engine". But my point is the engine is very light compared to engines designed to take full use of the resources a powerful PC has to offer. Basically the creation engine has nothing more than "Pre-baked", "PostProcessing" graphical features, such things are basically just filters or Illusions, they are not real-time rendered systems, this is why the engine is very light on resources and doesn't really demand much, so maxing Skyrim does not prove that ones system is powerful, it doesn't mean anything. Now engines like the Red engine 1,2,3 (Witcher 2), Cryengine (Crysis series), Frostbite 1,2,3 (Battlefield series) or whatever engine Metro series uses, these engines have realtime rendered systems for each graphical feature like Effects, Lighting, Weather, Physx, real Anti-Aliasing solutions as opposed to FXAA,SMAA, etc, this is what makes such engines demanding , things Skyrim simply doesn't have.
So long story short, a very old weak PC could be capable of maxing Skyrim out just fine as well. Now if you would tell us that you max out a very demanding game with a real PC designed engine, then I would understand your Pc's capabilities more.
I fully understand that.. Im a 3D digital artist myself I have a working knowledge about different engines and their rendering methods. My point of bringing up Skyrim was based on LA Noire's release era. Both games came out roughly around the same time. My point in bringing up Metro and BF4 were to conclude that more modern games have no struggle on my system. Let's face it.. Rockstar is PRO console and they built their previous games on an Xbox360/PS3 architecture. Nearly every time they ported something over to x86, it turned out to be a horrible mess in terms of optimization and framerate complaints.
I dont have much else to say to explain my PC's capabilities.. You've read my specs, you can get a rough idea how it plays out in modern games. LA Noire should not at all be a struggle. Its just a shame were it left a lot of us. At this point.. Im playing the game on the lowest settings at 1080p DX9 just to ensure I have 30fps with some drops to 24ish. I paid money for the game and I dont at all expect Steam to refund me based on Rockstars faults. Just want to put it out there for the record tho: It should not be allowed for certain games to be released when they are this broken. I've got a fairly modern setup FAR above the recommended requirements and the game struggles to run. Its not exactly fraud, but its certainly not fair to their customers..
Surely im not alone on this.. I just hate seeing games marketed in the sense that "oh, here is what you need to run the game well" (you have above and beyond that setup and still the game is crippled.)
Im ficken happy I got the game on sale and didnt purchase it full price. Because had that been the case, i'd really be pissed off. lol
Now the game works perfectly fine on the highest settings. No lag or any other issues at all.
Try that and see if it fixes the problem.
Also, as a side note, many people have said the reason the game is locked at 30 FPS is because the actor's facial features were recorded in 30 FPS. If they bumped it up to 60 FPS the voices and the facial movments in-game would be out a sync.