Monk or barbarian and multicalss

[aT0m_Pusher]

Thank you for this game, this is one of those rare gems that makes it a point to stay true to rules as written but more so making more of the badass elements of Tabletops seem so nonchalant in their inclusion. one simple request though well two. May we possibly see a monk class or a barbarian class, maybe both which i understand is much to ask for but hey i would certainly be willing to pay a DLC fee for these classes. Lastly multi-classing would be the cherry on top of this project. Great job to your team this game is truly a example in translating pen and paper to a videogame.

[dhraiden]

You should ask on the Discord, they are unlikely to see this post

[Second Batch]

I agree. In the meantime, there are pretty decent mods for all three of those things on nexus.

[aT0m_Pusher]

thank you both

[Usurper]

+1
Also missing a Barbarian in this Game,still think about buying it.
Saw that there is a Barb Mod,but i dont know if i wanna do a first playthrough with a Class that isnt made by the Devs.

[Revener]

They don't have the full D&D license.

[Grumpy Old Dude]

there will not be multi-class, for CotM. The devs have said this over and over and over again. MAYBE, is a future title. MAYBE.

BUT, since with backgrounds and class specializations, your wizard can wear mdm armor, your thief can wear mdm armor, your rogue can cast spells, your cleric can cast fireballs....what multiclass is lacking??????

[Ommamar]

Originally posted by Grumpy Old Dude:

there will not be multi-class, for CotM. The devs have said this over and over and over again. MAYBE, is a future title. MAYBE.

BUT, since with backgrounds and class specializations, your wizard can wear mdm armor, your thief can wear mdm armor, your rogue can cast spells, your cleric can cast fireballs....what multiclass is lacking??????

5E does a simulation of multiclassing, I think there are some bonuses but also some drawbacks. As you said with feats and back grounds you can make it so character builds can do things outside what they are normally allowed. One of the downsides though is if everyone wants a tanky wizard they take this background to allow for medium armor then the feat to allow for heavy armor. Every tanky wizard is built the exact same way where in 3.5E you could approach building a tanky wizard in several different ways. Choosing how and when you made the choices so a level 5 fighter/wizard could have 1-4 levels of wizard with 1 of fighter or vice versus. I understand the reasoning behind streamlining things the way they did but as usual with things like this they swung the pendulum back to much towards simplification.

[Grumpy Old Dude]

3.5E, 2E, AD&D, 4E...meaningless. Solasta has a limited 5E rule set license so....the other rule sets are totally irrelevant.

[Dorok]

Originally posted by Grumpy Old Dude:

3.5E, 2E, AD&D, 4E...meaningless. Solasta has a limited 5E rule set license so....the other rule sets are totally irrelevant.

It's an open source license, that's on this base but 3.5e version that Pathfinder was build, I doubt there's any special license to request to WotC.

And I doubt it's different with the open source 5.1e. If the shop page seems clue a license was provided by WotC it's more because the open source is from WtoC and Solasta uses it but hardly requested any special license.

So all Homebrew are allowed including to get some inspiration from 3.5e. But I don't see the point, better start from open source version for 3.5e.

[Dorok]

About OP wish, I would tend agree, but I think the dev should better focus on a complete campain editor, including NPC, dialog, global map including custom global map, locations, travels design, travels events. Frankly play series of dungeons isn't appealing one second for me.

[Grumpy Old Dude]

What is Solasta?

It is T.A.s interpretation of the 5E rule set, SRD. PERIOD. Might as well be asking Solasta to be a flight sim, or a racing sim. It isnt one of those things. Nor is it a 3.5E game. Why this is so difficult to grasp, evades me entirely. It's 5E. Get use to it.

[Dorok]

Lol.

[Berserkr]

Man you ♥♥♥♥♥♥ two need a room

[Dorok]

You two? I'm not starting with badly hidden insults, as " Why this is so difficult to grasp". I don't even bother on any of his post this time and get a smash, ridiculous, hence the LOL.

[jsaving]

Originally posted by Revener:

They don't have the full D&D license.

Yeah, there are some limitations on what they are able to do. But the monk, the barbarian, and multiclassing are all in the SRD so their exclusion was a choice on the devs' part rather than a limitation forced on them by their license.