Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
All trailers on steam do in-fact show the camera footage and bits of act 2. Just watched them to double check. Besides I really don’t get how it’s a bait and switch even if you expected only a card game. You can stay in act 1 as long as you want. Act 2 just adds deck building as opposed to pure rougelike and act 3 is more similar to act 1 than 2. I don’t get the complaint. If you wanted a card game that’s decently difficult and requires making some tough decisions about how you build with what you are given, act 2 still has all of that. Do you just not like the art style?
Also you don’t have to watch any of the camera footage ever outside of the one the game starts with.
Ah so your just disappointed that the game is 2d. Act 3 is 3D try to hang on if you can. Or just quit now because the indie game doesn’t have state of the art graphics. I really don’t care which.
Personally I'm rather more inclined to buy it now that I know there's a part to it that is actually good-looking. This early 3D style still looks as ugly as it did 25 years ago.
I feel scammed too. :(