Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLeVtvf69N6wvQUeBqlNgHq7V_x_6yIn5y&si=7EZEXvaibvs5Xkm8
Edit: Mhm, dynamic dialogue and voice overs would be some good...
LOL.
The whole point of a game is that you get a specific experience curated and created by the game developers and writers. Generic AI-written slop would ruin all of that. Can't imagine anyone who seriously cares about games or art actually wanting such a thing.
Real human players are so 2020...
Players will notice and tear apart any game attempting to use AI to generate "intelligent" quests rather than procedural quests (which players already ridicule).
There were some holdouts claiming they could use any material in their libraries despite the artists never having agreed to a technology that didn't exist at the time of the contract. Only dumpster-diving developers resort to AI, now.
AI is a useful tool, but it is also a tool that cannot replace people without cheating those people whose performances and art were used to train the AI.
Then again, people who think it should be okay are either unaware of the personal costs involved or just don't care about anything or anyone beyond what they want. I've encountered way too many people who are of the latter variety to have faith that people who endorse trained AI production are the former.