Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Not considering Dogtown content you’re basically playing the same content that has always been there it’s just much less likely now for you to get glitches and crashes, they added updated user interface, made some tweaks, and added conveniences and shortcuts.
Honestly tho, I played day-1, it was not that bad. Not on decent PC anyway. Completely dead on last gen consoles tho. They should've never tried to release it there, it was just a lie.
A lot of improvements since then, quite massive in fact, gameplay andperformance wise, but still, the release wasn't as bad as people say, aside fro the consoles. Obviously it's not cool to screw thousandsof people, but I'm just saying that if you had the hardware, it's was pretty good even on release.
It's still a crappy looter shooter, driving still feels as if vehicles are skatting on ice, barely any RPG choices (why is it still labeled like that on the Steam Store as such when CDPR itself admitted that it's not an RPG is beyond me) and the story is mid.
It's nothing compared to Kingdom Come Deliverance
You do make good points, but the fact still remains that Skyrim scratches a certain itch that very, VERY few games do. There's honestly no true comparison to "the skyrim experience" esxept for Fallout 3 and 4, which were made by the same studio.
Sure there are plenty of games out there that do certain aspects far better. Combat, exploration, magic, quests...they can all be far better in other games. But Skyrim still had that great combination of all of them that made gamers in general come back to it time and time again. You could deny this all you want, but the statistics would prove you wrong if you do.
Play a Yakuza game.
Every single game in that franchise is an infinitely better open world RPG than Cyberpunk.
Play through Yakuza Zero once and you're not coming back to Cyberpunk.
You say that but you're still here playing Cyberpunk. haha. I'm now convinced you're a closet fan of the game. You trash it constantly, but keep coming back for more.
If I had the same opinion you did, I would have cut my burden a long time ago and forever keep it uninstalled, buried and moved on. But not you. You always jump back into Night City. It calls you. It seduces you. Admit it. You love it.
Strange you say KCD as that's the buggiest game I've ever played!!! I bought it early and it f*cked my monitor where the games resolution changes were fixed to your monitor and it burned my monitor. Also, the game has game breaking bugs where it bugs out depending on mission quest order. I'm hoping KCD2 is better as I liked KCD as a game...but bugs!!! My lord!!!
I've played RDR2 and was too slow to me. Not sure why when you make a post people assume you've never played a game haha
I do most things on foot in cyberpunk, walking and taking it all in, I keep find new things I not seen before in previous runs.
It actually slower than on a horse in rdr2 xd
I more mean slower paced as in not as much to do. This is obviously as in design as a wild west setting will obviously have more space than in a futuristic setting. Maybe simply preference though...as most things are. RDR2 is a beautiful game, but I lost interest