Is it actually over for GTX bros?

[Lampda]

Minimum requires an RTX now?
Or is that specifically for those using ray tracing enabled?

I'm getting both "You are screwed with that GTX 1650" and or "You are fine dude"

What is actually true here?

[Dravic]

Originally posted by Lampda:

Minimum requires an RTX now?

I really do not understand where you got that. Please look at the requirements table one more time.

https://steamcommunity.com/games/1091500/announcements/detail/3692435565227438022?snr=2_9_100003_

[(TTV)OnBrandRP]

If you expect to do any modern gaming on a GTX 1650 you're pretty much ♥♥♥♥ out of luck. That card is specifically meant to be a entry level graphics card, meaning it will run the game but goodluck getting a stable 60fps experience.

Put this into perceptive. The GTX 16xx cards are turing based architecture. They're basically baby RTX cards without any of the actual benefits of RTX outside of maybe the latest nvenc libraries for streamers, etc. Basically just GTX cards with some RTX technology. They aren't exactly powerhouses by any means, even your older brother the 1660ti is fairly weak nowadays.

The reason the minimum specs listings were changed was because recommendations for games can change as they progress or as better hardware releases. Can you still run the game at 30fps on all low? Probably. Should you? Up to you, Would I? ♥♥♥♥ no lol

It was changed because nowadays RTX 20/30 series is very affordable for a lot of people. Specifically the 2080 Super is a very affordable option just as my RTX 3060TI is very affordable as well and either or can run the game without much issues at 1080p/1440p 60fps no problem.

If I were you as soon as you're able to, buy a better gpu if plausible (aka if you have a laptop, RIP)

[Dravic]

Originally posted by Buckhunter:

snip

Well said. It's a bit sad that people ignore the game becoming more complex and instead complain & see malice in developers' desire to improve the game and make it even more fun.

Also I will say to OP: if you find yourself unable to run the game as before, you can roll back to previous versions at any time. There's a few ways to stay on 1.63 forever if you like:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5H-Lef0YS0

[Lampda]

Originally posted by Dravic:

Originally posted by Lampda:

Minimum requires an RTX now?

I really do not understand where you got that. Please look at the requirements table one more time.

https://steamcommunity.com/games/1091500/announcements/detail/3692435565227438022?snr=2_9_100003_

damn. I was being screwed with.

Was only shown the right side by a friend and telling me I was robbed.

[Dravic]

Originally posted by Lampda:

Was only shown the right side by a friend and telling me I was robbed. :dos2skull:

The game might run worse for you now, but as I said above, you can just elect to stay on 1.63 indefinitely. It is just a few easy steps away.

I highly recommend that you do that if you feel uncomfortable with the performance you are getting on 2.0, once it releases!

[Lampda]

Originally posted by Dravic:

Originally posted by Buckhunter:

snip

Well said. It's a bit sad that people ignore the game becoming more complex and instead complain & see malice in developers' desire to improve the game and make it even more fun.

I am well aware of this already. Just was curious if this was true for Cyberpunk's update since I don't get much time to actually check in on this nowadays

[Lampda]

Originally posted by Dravic:

Originally posted by Lampda:

Was only shown the right side by a friend and telling me I was robbed.

The game might run worse for you now, but as I said above, you can just elect to stay on 1.63 indefinitely. It is just a few easy steps away.

I highly recommend that you do that if you feel uncomfortable with the performance you are getting on 2.0, once it releases!

Yeah will do. cheers

[evostevokanevo]

After reading this I'm happy that i decided to upgrade to a newer GPU as soon as i have the money to do so. This game does a passable job on the 1650 super but seen 4060 for around $300 so might upgrade to that.

[Mixer]

to be fair just wait for the dlc to drop, I imagine you can tweek quite a few settings

[Barnobestabn]

i got a rtx 4060 TI 8gb it runs 1080p games like nobody bussiness. just dont expect over 60 fps with rtx on. unless you have dlss turned on.

[(TTV)OnBrandRP]

Originally posted by Barnobestabn:

i got a rtx 4060 TI 8gb it runs 1080p games like nobody bussiness. just dont expect over 60 fps with rtx on. unless you have dlss turned on.

Even with DLSS and Frame Gen, a 4060 ti will not do you wonders for a stable raytraced 60fps. Raytracing is just that heavy when it hits.

[Dravic]

Originally posted by Buckhunter:

Originally posted by Barnobestabn:

i got a rtx 4060 TI 8gb it runs 1080p games like nobody bussiness. just dont expect over 60 fps with rtx on. unless you have dlss turned on.

Even with DLSS and Frame Gen, a 4060 ti will not do you wonders for a stable raytraced 60fps. Raytracing is just that heavy when it hits.

It's down to the target output resolution.

At 2560x1440 with heavy concessions in the internal resolution department, a 4060ti could manage 45-60fps experience with all bells and whistles engaged (Super Resolution & Frame Generation) with RT Overdrive. Won't look that good due to low internal resolution but it will be reasonably smooth and maybe even will look better than it does now with DLSS3.5 in the near future.

Ada Lovelace is a crazy architecture.

[Bishop-Six]

Use XESS, problem solved.

[Kucingilang]

im on Ryzen 5 2600 with rtx 3060, is that good? my pc wont melt right? if yes, i wont risk to play it until i upgrade my pc.

[Aliceskysareblue]

pretty much, 1660ti is getting old and the 10 series is going to stop getting support in a year or two.