Why limit romance options so much

[Penny]

Like this game is so tight on everything and romance was one of the points it didn't have to be

[ARTSQ]

It's limited in everything that relates to choice-making.

[DrTh0ll]

it would have been neat to romance any of the characters regardless of your characters chosen identity

[Gigith]

Everyone be careful of what they say.

[Tenshin51]

I guess they are building up the sequel if CDPR planning to have Cyberpunk 2. Making Judy and other romanceable counterpart somewhat non-canon like Shani in Witcher 3.

Totally wish they could just let V bang Alt or Rogue.

[Kool Shade]

I agree you have the option to make a character that looks female, but has male gender qualities, and voice.

but your romances are still limited to heterosexual. ( No alternate life styles, open mindedness what ever. )

It seems to me it would have been better to have done the skyrim thinking, and just ignored gender choice in romance all together.

[Gigith]

Originally posted by Kool Shade:

I agree you have the option to make a character that looks female, but has male gender qualities, and voice.

but your romances are still limited to heterosexual. ( No by-sexual, alternate life styles, open mindedness what ever. )

It seems to me it would have been better to have done the skyrim thinking, and just ignored gender choice in romance all together.

The hookers are all bi-sexual. Being bi myself I find that reserving bisexuality only for hookers to be a little offensive, but that's just me.

I'm not arguing moderation, only helping you understand the forum rules as they have been told to me; suggesting the characters should be bi is not okay here. I am neither for nor against this rule, but no point in you getting a warning if you can avoid it.

[>//The_FALCON]

why do you even care. the sex scenes are only like 10 seconds long anyway...

[melon]

Originally posted by >//The_FALCONTnY:

why do you even care. the sex scenes are only like 10 seconds long anyway...

And they’re not very interesting to watch. They keep cutting to different positions. But in truth they didn’t do a good with this in the Witcher 3 even. Probably was never a huge focus.

[jack_of_tears]

The characters don't need to be 'bi', they just need to be down for your character, regardless of their gender. I don't recall anything in the storylines that suggests the characters have to be one sexuality or the other before you meet them, so the only variable is in how they respond to you.

Regardless of whether these characters should be more openly available in a video game world where transhumanism makes the idea of modern sexuality pretty silly to begin with, there should have been more than 1 option for each type of character. Give us two options, so we aren't forced to romance the same character every time.

[Datawarlock]

It's 2020, don't wanna piss off the less than 1%

[Dregora]

Originally posted by Kool Shade:

I agree you have the option to make a character that looks female, but has male gender qualities, and voice.

but your romances are still limited to heterosexual. ( No by-sexual, alternate life styles, open mindedness what ever. )

It seems to me it would have been better to have done the skyrim thinking, and just ignored gender choice in romance all together.

Not really. As male V, I was able to both romance Panam (female) and River (male). You are not limited in that regard. They're trying to tell a story, Skyrim wasn't really trying to do that all that much.

[Gigith]

Originally posted by jack_of_tears:

The characters don't need to be 'bi', they just need to be down for your character, regardless of their gender. I don't recall anything in the storylines that suggests the characters have to be one sexuality or the other before you meet them, so the only variable is in how they respond to you.

Regardless of whether these characters should be more openly available in a video game world where transhumanism makes the idea of modern sexuality pretty silly to begin with, there should have been more than 1 option for each type of character. Give us two options, so we aren't forced to romance the same character every time.

That is true. I could imagine a sort of quantum entanglement situation where a character is gay/straight if you start the game as their sex/opposite sex, and bi or straight if you're the opposite gender.

[Gigith]

Originally posted by Dregora:

Originally posted by Kool Shade:

I agree you have the option to make a character that looks female, but has male gender qualities, and voice.

but your romances are still limited to heterosexual. ( No by-sexual, alternate life styles, open mindedness what ever. )

It seems to me it would have been better to have done the skyrim thinking, and just ignored gender choice in romance all together.

Not really. As male V, I was able to both romance Panam (female) and River (male). You are not limited in that regard. They're trying to tell a story, Skyrim wasn't really trying to do that all that much.

https://screenrant.com/romance-river-guide-cyberpunk-2077/
Most sources say River is strictly straight?

[Husker_85]

Originally posted by Dregora:

Not really. As male V, I was able to both romance Panam (female) and River (male). You are not limited in that regard. They're trying to tell a story, Skyrim wasn't really trying to do that all that much.

You got with River as male V?! How?

[ElviraDemonQueen]

Originally posted by YoRHaDarling:

Like this game is so tight on everything and romance was one of the points it didn't have to be

you know i dont ask alot for this but when i got relation ship with judy and she say to live with her i can storage my guns at her place but sleeping with her or interact with her a little bit like giving her a kiss or ask any new events hase happend and get to see her lay next to you when waking up will been a nice tutch for someone that hase a relationship in real but sadly its not like that witch maked me really sad sooo relationships dont really care for me no more